tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Saturday, December 21st, 2:19PM

Insurance

rss
Latest Headlines

Partners Life turns loss to profit

Partners Life has turned around its net loss in the year to March 31 last year into a $4.97 million profit this year, and paid out more than $62 million in commission to advisers.

Wednesday, October 2nd 2013, 3:00PM 4 Comments

The company's accounts show that it reported a $2.18 million loss last year on premium revenue of $7.98 million. This year it has reported a profit of $4.97 million on premium revenue of $38.37 million.

Advisers were paid $59.57 million in commission in the 12 months to March 31. Another $1.38 million was spent on shadow shares and another $19.75 million is shown as “other acquisition expenses.”

Maintenance and general growth and development costs are recorded at $8.23 million with bulk of this being commissions.

Added together total commissions and operating expenses came to $88.96 million.

Shadow Shares
Advisers also picked up more shares under the shadow share scheme.

The scheme “is designed to incentivise advisers to write strong volumes of business while maintaining good persistency over a number of years,” the company says.

It is open to all IFAs subject to minimum production criteria in each scheme year. Shadow shares are allocated at the rate of one share for each $20 of issued annual premium net of lapses.

Partners Life then waits three years to see what the persistency is like and if it is more than 85%, the adviser can choose to use the extra commission to take the shares at the price they would have been issued at three years earlier, or the net cash.

There are more than two million shares outstanding under the scheme, with a weighted average exercise price of $2.70 – up from less than one million a year earlier.
Ballantyne said the scheme meant that if the business was run well in its early years, advisers would benefit from the growth in share price. “There’s value in our business doing well for them.”

She said it was not something that would unduly influence advisers because they still needed to be able to prove their advice was right for their clients.

“But provided we can come out with product that is right for the customer, there’s an opportunity to earn wealth, and it drives persistency over the long term.”

Advisers were also issued loans of $413,761 in the year, down from more than $700,000 in 2012, and repaid almost $1 million.

The company offers loans for a term of three years, secured against an adviser’s assets.

The company’s seven executive directors were paid $1.27 million and its staff more than $10 million.

Reinsurance
Reinsurance has been a touchy issue for Partners Life - the Reserve Bank is looking at the prctice in relation to solvency standards, and whether a risk transfer occurs or whether the deal is a loan and should be reflected in accounts as such.

Partners Life said the situation was too uncertain for it to estimate any potential impact on its solvency position.

With regards to the Reserve Bank’s June consultation paper it says: “It is too uncertain for the company to be able to accurately estimate any potential impact on the company’s solvency position in respect of the matters considered in the consultation paper.”

“If certain specified termination events were to occur, the company may have been required to pay to SCOR a recapture fee equivalent tot eh credit balance of the Original Experience Account. The reinsurance treaties have been updated to significantly limit the ability of SCOR to demand immediate recovery of the amounts that may become payable to it if such a termination event were to occur, in order to protect the interests of policyholders.”

SCOR has indicated its medium-term support for the company.

Partners says its minimum solvency capital requirement are $32.17 million and it has actual solvency capital of $37.13 million which gives it a $4.96 million buffer.

Claims
Partners paid claims totalling $11.75 million in the 12-month period. Just over $5 million was paid in death claims and the rest were accounted for by trauma, disability and medical claims. It recovered $7.12 million in claims through reinsurance.

Reinsurers chipped in $7 million for the company’s $11.75 million in claims. Reinsurance cost Partners $23.1 million in the year, up from $5.2 million in 2012.

« GPG sells out of TOWER Make sure policies cover what clients need: Southern Cross »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 3 October 2013 at 6:25 pm billy the broker said:
And...so what....yawn....put the stats up for other companies..as well as putting up stats for how much is replaced business...don't get me going on this again please....!!!
On 7 October 2013 at 12:26 pm baffled said:
Is there a lot missing from this article or is it me... my calculator says, enter $38.37m Revenue, simply take away expenses at circa $88.93.... i can't get a positive $4.97m gain? And thats forgetting all the other worrying stuff in the article... (perhaps i should just slide into denial).
On 15 November 2013 at 9:47 am Goldstar said:
In answer to baffled's question... from my days in the management of a large insurance company I think the way it works is that the company can 'book' the future premium income into the current years accounts. The $38.37m of income is not just income for the current year... it will continue to flow for an estimated 5 - 9 years (depending on the persistency of the book). Of course it will also increase with automatic age and CPI adjustments. The company I worked for used a Sales Value Indicator (SVI) of 1.5 for risk business. This meant that for every $1 of premium bought in there was $1.50 of profit for the company's books that year. This was after allowing for commission, mortality charges (claims), reinsurance and other expenses. So Partners Life received $15.34m after reinsurance which created a bookable gross profit of maybe $23m, which is then reduced by acquisition and establishment costs. That's my guess anyway?
On 16 November 2013 at 10:25 am David Whyte said:
Hmm interesting take on the financials. In my era the collected premium for the financial year - new and renewal - was booked into the P & L account. The commission or acquisition cost was deferred (spread) over a period of years equating to the average life of a policy, so the total commission expense was not taken in year 1. With 100% first year rebate - and reinsurance financing - the profit was achievable without taking profits from future premiums into the financial statements. The actuarial analysis for the FCR would certainly have made some assumptions around the embedded value based on the future value of current income, but in my experience, the financial statements referred to current/accrued income and expenses. The more the RBNZ gains familiarity with life insurance accounting, the better the regulatory oversight we should expect. As a licensed, regulated insurer, I submit that Partners is a valid and significant player in the NZ market.

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Partners exits Adviser Support Programme
Partners Life has moved its Adviser Support Programme to a third party compliance provider.

Apex Advice buys life business
Auckland-based Apex Advice has acquired a well-established insurance advice business.

Chubb's latest champion
Young maths prodigy takes out actuarial award.

New book: Unlocking group insurance
Christchurch adviser Corey Williams has released a new book helping advisers and employers put group insurance schemes in place.

News Bites
Latest Comments
  • The good guys get told off
    “I can't quite reconcile the rationale, or lack thereof, with the comments so far. Pathfinder were found to have made misleading...”
    2 days ago by John Milner
  • The good guys get told off
    “As a follow on to this conversation: I'm assuming that the Regulator will be consistent by 'naming and shaming' the other...”
    2 days ago by Pragmatic
  • The good guys get told off
    “FMA does not understand the consequences of these type of actions A number of Insurance Companies were taken to court and...”
    2 days ago by LNF
  • The good guys get told off
    “Superlife was censored for using unregistered salespeople however what is not commonly known was that the FMA were aware...”
    3 days ago by Patrickdiack
  • The good guys get told off
    “FMA executive director, Response and Enforcement, Louise Unger said:... Unger was appointed to that role in April of this...”
    3 days ago by Aggressively_passive
Subscribe Now

Cover Notes - Specific news aimed at risk advisers

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com
x