Capital Protected Commodities

Liontamer’s new fund invests with the benefit of hindsight. In this article Liontamer Head of Investment Solutions, Janine Starks, explains how the fund was created. When we enter the product development phase for a new capital protected fund, one of the most important questions we ask ourselves is this: “What features suit the current investment climate?”

Liontamer have led the way in the NZ market with two previous funds and it’s important that we continue to offer opportunities which are untapped by others. We felt it was important to take a fresh look at commodities and offer investors a fund positioned for the current climate.

On a recent product development trip to Europe, we analysed a wide variety of possible structures. We looked at momentum strategies, trends based strategies and even considered a particular CTA/hedge fund strategy. One very important sector discovery was that soft commodities were gaining attention due to their use in the bio-fuel sector (corn and sugar to ethanol) as well as substantial demand from emerging economies with rising wealth.

Our conclusion was that commodities markets are still being driven by very powerful macro economic factors. The fundamentals are still in place, but the returns from different sectors could be far more diverse. Our fund needed to take advantage of the outlook, but with added flexibility. If there is a retraction in a particular commodity sector, we want to limit our exposure to it.

Capital protection allows us to limit our risk to the overall asset class, but we also wanted to ensure one bad egg in a sector didn’t severely affect our returns.

Our desire was to re-engineer the fund’s returns, by over-weighting the winners and under-weighting the losers. One of the most powerful features we wanted to put in place was a commodities index that could completely drop the worst performing component (i.e. give a 0% weighting).

To accommodate this, we came up with the ‘rainbow’ feature, which is also referred to as ‘perfect hindsight’. The concept is very simple (another important consideration for investors). The taste-test is being able to explain it in one sentence.

Here's the short of it:
"To calculate an investor's return at maturity, we wait until we've seen the performance of the commodities and then allocate more money to the best performers and less or no money to the poorest performers."

Here's the extra bit of detail:
A chart tells the story (see below). There are 5 commodities in the basket and 5 fixed weightings. We have the luxury of allocating 30% to each of the top 3 performers, 10% to the 4th performer and we exclude the worst performer from the basket.

The rainbow feature gives investors a great deal of extra comfort. Take the market for oil as an example. Investors want the opportunity of oil exposure, but what if prices fall? If oil is the worst performer over the investment term, it will be given a 0% weighting at maturity. For other fund managers, that would be a very large call and likely to be a huge move from their benchmark. Without the benefit of hindsight, this would be outside their comfort zone.

5 commodities	+	5 rainbow weights
Oil Want to read the full article? Click the button below to subscribe and will have free unlimited access for a limited time to full article and all other articles on the site. You will also be able to comment on articles on Good Returns. Sign in Previous Article Next Article Latest News AMP takes a stake in Ralph Stewart run Retirement Income Group 2 min read FMA wants clearer fees 5 min read [Weekly Wrap] Research shows KiwiSaver is a key issue in the election; GRTV Special looks at what's on offer. 3 min read Milford helps advisers tackle performance questions 3 min read Special Report More Read Tower launches a faster way to connect clients with insurance cover 3 min read Trustees Executors, New Zealand’s first Trustee Company, Starts Next Chapter 7 min read India’s investment boom 2 min read Unlock New Opportunities with OMNIMax’s KiwiSaver Advice Tool 4 min read Latest Comments FMA wants clearer fees The Report (p.14) contains the following recommendation for FAPs: "Disclose commissions as a dollar figure. While commissions can be disclosed as either a percentage or dollar figure, we consider disclosure in dollar terms to be good practice to assist with investors readily understanding what the adviser will get out of the advice process." Disclosing commission in dollar figures was one of the 3 options floated in the April 2018 Disclosure Requirements discussion paper from MBIE. This option was ultimately rejected in favour of a principles-based approach. The examples of commission disclosure in the resulting Regulations ("Connor and Ari") are expressed in percentage terms. While the FMA may hold the view that disclosure in dollar terms is "good practice", this is not where the regulations landed at the conclusion of the 2018 consultation process. 22 hours ago Paul Flood Advisers embrace Westpac after trail commissions removed @The Laird - No, not really. The headline of this article could equally have been: "Advisers embrace Westpac after upfront commissions increased to highest across the main banks." 1 day ago Paul Flood Advisers embrace Westpac after trail commissions removed Doesn't this result call into question the criticism from certain quarters that Mortgage Advisers are driven predominantly by commission considerations? 1 day ago The Laird FMA wants clearer fees @first time caller - I can see the complexity you highlight, but as above, investors should be able to see what they are paying without having to reference multiple documents. Investment admin can track and report deductions for tax, withdrawals, fees et al, would be /should be straightforward to aggregate advice fees into costs at member level... at least I hope so. 2 days ago Goldcard FMA wants clearer fees @goldcard - how would you propose that a fund manager calculates the TER to include adviser fees given not all clients pay them and different advisers charge different fees, not to mention some advisors charge different fees to different clients? The advice fee gets disclosed in the adviser's disclosure statement and the statement of advice, so the client can add that to the published TER of the fund they are invested in to see how much they are paying overall. 3 days ago First time caller