KiwiSaver
Cullen fudges over super fund
Thursday 28th of February 2002
(Finance Minister) Michael Cullen unsuccessfully tried fudging the issue of growing Government debt and borrowings due to contributions needed for his Super Fund when appearing before (Thursday's) Finance and Expenditure select committee," National finance spokesman David Carter says.
Carter says the Finance Minister attempted to brush off queries over the super fund and refused to admit that its contributions help account for the massive $10.6 billion in required borrowings or are a significant factor in the $6.6 billion gross debt increase over the next five years. "However, in subsequent questioning, Treasury head Allan Bollard contradicted Dr Cullen, conceding it was 'simple arithmetic' that removing the New Zealand Superannuation Fund would reduce financing requirements from $10.6 billion to $2.7 billion." Carter says this is clearly outlined on page 53 of the Budget Policy Statement 2002 and the December Economic and Fiscal Update 2001. "When will Dr Cullen accept what his officials, Treasury and the public already know - that he is borrowing to finance his super fund?" Carter concluded. This is a press release from National's finance spokesman David Carter.
Want to read the full article?
Click the button below to subscribe and will have free unlimited access for a limited time to full article and all other articles on the site.
You will also be able to comment on articles on Good Returns.
Latest News
5 min read
3 min read
Latest Comments
Advisers embrace Westpac after trail commissions removed
@The Laird - No, not really. The headline of this article could equally have been: "Advisers embrace Westpac after upfront commissions increased to highest across the main banks."
7 hours ago Paul Flood
Advisers embrace Westpac after trail commissions removed
Doesn't this result call into question the criticism from certain quarters that Mortgage Advisers are driven predominantly by commission considerations?
12 hours ago The Laird
FMA wants clearer fees
@first time caller - I can see the complexity you highlight, but as above, investors should be able to see what they are paying without having to reference multiple documents. Investment admin can track and report deductions for tax, withdrawals, fees et al, would be /should be straightforward to aggregate advice fees into costs at member level... at least I hope so.
1 day ago Goldcard
FMA wants clearer fees
@goldcard - how would you propose that a fund manager calculates the TER to include adviser fees given not all clients pay them and different advisers charge different fees, not to mention some advisors charge different fees to different clients? The advice fee gets disclosed in the adviser's disclosure statement and the statement of advice, so the client can add that to the published TER of the fund they are invested in to see how much they are paying overall.
2 days ago First time caller
FMA wants clearer fees
Schedule 4 of the FMCA regs 2014, particularly clauses 2(1) and 53(3) provide the basis for excluding individually charged advice fees from the statutory TER. This was introduced with the best of intentions, but now it is little more than an invisibility cloak for deductions from member accounts.
2 days ago Goldcard