News
Rules tightening around mortgagee sales
Friday 6th of November 2009
The changes are included in a discussion document released by Revenue Minister Peter Dunne yesterday.
At present, the Goods and Services Act tightly defines what is a mortgagee sale and allows the GST component to be recovered by the Inland Revenue Department (IRD). Investors who are in trouble are making arrangements which make it appear the mortgagor, not the mortgagee, is carrying out the sale.
The proposed changes give the IRD powers to deem a sale a mortgagee sale if it has one or more of the following characteristics:
- A mortgagee taking control of, or inducing the sale of, the property by exercising a power under a contract with a mortgagor;
- A mortgagee signing the sale and purchase agreement, or requesting the mortgagor to sign the sale and purchase agreement as already negotiated by the mortgagee;
- A mortgagee organising services related to selling the property, such as building, conveyancing, auctioning or advertising services;
- A mortgagee paying directly for the services related to selling the property;
- A mortgagor's solicitor also being the mortgagee's solicitor;
- A purchaser being associated with the mortgagee.
Want to read the full article?
Click the button below to subscribe and will have free unlimited access for a limited time to full article and all other articles on the site.
You will also be able to comment on articles on Good Returns.
Latest News
Latest Comments
FMA wants clearer fees
The Report (p.14) contains the following recommendation for FAPs: "Disclose commissions as a dollar figure. While commissions can be disclosed as either a percentage or dollar figure, we consider disclosure in dollar terms to be good practice to assist with investors readily understanding what the adviser will get out of the advice process."
Disclosing commission in dollar figures was one of the 3 options floated in the April 2018 Disclosure Requirements discussion paper from MBIE.
This option was ultimately rejected in favour of a principles-based approach.
The examples of commission disclosure in the resulting Regulations ("Connor and Ari") are expressed in percentage terms.
While the FMA may hold the view that disclosure in dollar terms is "good practice", this is not where the regulations landed at the conclusion of the 2018 consultation process.
1 day ago Paul Flood
Advisers embrace Westpac after trail commissions removed
@The Laird - No, not really. The headline of this article could equally have been: "Advisers embrace Westpac after upfront commissions increased to highest across the main banks."
1 day ago Paul Flood
Advisers embrace Westpac after trail commissions removed
Doesn't this result call into question the criticism from certain quarters that Mortgage Advisers are driven predominantly by commission considerations?
1 day ago The Laird
FMA wants clearer fees
@first time caller - I can see the complexity you highlight, but as above, investors should be able to see what they are paying without having to reference multiple documents. Investment admin can track and report deductions for tax, withdrawals, fees et al, would be /should be straightforward to aggregate advice fees into costs at member level... at least I hope so.
2 days ago Goldcard
FMA wants clearer fees
@goldcard - how would you propose that a fund manager calculates the TER to include adviser fees given not all clients pay them and different advisers charge different fees, not to mention some advisors charge different fees to different clients? The advice fee gets disclosed in the adviser's disclosure statement and the statement of advice, so the client can add that to the published TER of the fund they are invested in to see how much they are paying overall.
3 days ago First time caller