GoodReturns
Passbacks - How do they work?
Jon-Paul Hale

Passbacks - How do they work?

Jon Paul-Hale looks into the issue of passbacks, and how they work.

Jon-Paul Hale
Wed, Nov 15th 2023 06:01AM
Attestations, qualifications, and just general tick boxing

Attestations, qualifications, and just general tick boxing

4 min read
Privacy - Do we really understand it?

Privacy - Do we really understand it?

5 min read
Authority Documents - What’s too far?

Authority Documents - What’s too far?

7 min read
Let's talk about trust

Let's talk about trust

7 min read
Providers need to do the right thing when nobody is watching

Providers need to do the right thing when nobody is watching

6 min read
Burning down the house

Burning down the house

6 min read
We may be trusted advisers to our clients, but insurers don't trust us

We may be trusted advisers to our clients, but insurers don't trust us

6 min read
Review of Loadings and Exclusions

Review of Loadings and Exclusions

5 min read
New law - new rules

New law - new rules

8 min read
The single biggest challenge with existing policies

The single biggest challenge with existing policies

7 min read
New Regime, New Thinking

New Regime, New Thinking

4 min read
Where in the Code is this?

Where in the Code is this?

5 min read
Things advisers should be doing at claim time

Things advisers should be doing at claim time

3 min read
When really does a life insurance policy start?

When really does a life insurance policy start?

5 min read
Specificity and Policy Wordings

Specificity and Policy Wordings

5 min read
Insuranmce Briefs
Chubb Life expands Life Lens eligibility across full Assurance Extra range
2 min read
The importance of health insurance tools
2 min read
AIA expands menopause support toolkit
1 min read
AIA adds grocery discounts to Vitality
1 min read
Latest Comments
FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
Paul Flood: The danger is that the 'goalposts' (regarding what is acceptable or unacceptable adviser conduct) may be susceptible to change. Our 'Principles based' legal/regulatory environment lends itself to “prevalence-induced concept change” over time, perhaps not so much in the written laws and Code, as in the interpretation of the prescribed principles.
2 days ago Steve Wright
FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
Just a tip, if you use more than six, six letter words in a sentence you lose most Kiwi's. So avoid client/adviser confusion when writing your post or article if you would like it read and understood. Ironically, my last sentence was not likely read.
2 days ago Backstage
FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
All things said are great aspirational goals for a great financial advice industry, it mirrors what both the legislation and the code requires. However, like most things discussed it talks about what's expected not how it's done. The hardest aspect of financial advice today isn't what it is, it is how it is done. The how only comes from those that have done it, the how is only provided with examples. Guidance documents that spell out what's required along side how it it done. We’re still dealing with the same issues we started with in 2021, figuring out the how. And figuring out the how in every advice business is consuming resources that could easily be shortcut by the FMA demonstrating what they are expecting. It's not about “do it this way” its about this is the sorts of things we’re looking for. In the absence of standards and expectations, guesswork prevails. That represents significant risk to FAPs and the result is onerous overcooked advice processes for multiple advice operations and undercooked she’ll be right for single operators focused on getting the work done. Both approaches have potential for harm and as its been said earlier, leaves advisers open to explain they haven't been speeding with the authorities have pulled them over. The advice industry needs guidance on the how we know the what already.
4 days ago Jon-Paul Hale
Who is responsible for notifying policy changes?
Sticking an oar in, while we have “service” requirements the expectation that an adviser is responsible for discussing said change is relying heavily on assumption. 1. That the client hasn't moved and contact details haven't been updated. It happens more often than many think. 2. It assumes there is a servicing agreement in place to provide service. Remember the requirement is to scope service not provide it. A client deciding to have ad-hoc service on their request is a legally valid position to have. 3. If there is a service agreement that's realistic to what is expected, how long does the adviser push the issue to have the discussion before moving on with everything else they have to do? Again, a point that is not clear in the guidance to date. The challenge of the present rules is the adviser is responsible for ensuring the client understands the advice provided. How do you ensure you're covering this if a client doesn't engage despite genuine attempts to manage it? There's still a lot of “what if’s” in this whole are we’re only going to have clarity on once someone is taken to task about it. But first we need to have clarity on what ongoing service actually is, because right now demonstrated by the direct providers a letter once per year with a please call if you want to discuss is the current minimum…
4 days ago Jon-Paul Hale
FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
To correct errors in my previous post: "policies, templates, and controls" should read "policies, processes, systems and controls", and "is more conductive" should read "is more conducive".
5 days ago Paul Flood