First monitoring feedback complete
Wednesday, July 13th 2011, 5:00AM 8 Comments
by FMA
« Your advice (on FMA ads) please | Financial summit needs to cover life risks too » |
Special Offers
Comments from our readers
On 14 July 2011 at 6:26 pm Mel Hewitson said:
Hi Alison
You have asked this same question before, to which I replied:
You may recall Ross Butler, Chair of the Code Committee saying that getting the ticket to the game is just the beginning and it’s how you play the game that then counts.
Once you’re an AFA and get close to the end of your initial 5 year (typical term) licence, FMA will consider your application for licence renewal.
Before FMA can renew your licence, we have a statutory responsibility to be satisfied that you have actually complied with the Act, the terms & conditions and the Code during the five years since your initial licence was granted.
In summary:
- Passing competency assessments shows us you can do it.
- Your ABS tells us how you do it.
- A visit by FMA will tell us whether you are doing it.
I hope this helps.
On 15 July 2011 at 10:44 am Alison said:
Mel, I quite agree with all you are saying here: before advisors can be granted a licence renewal they need to show they have complied with the Act/Code.
But instead of "once you get close to the initial 5 year licence", the FMA seems to be checking up on people with 5 months - or even 5 weeks - of their authorisation.
On 19 July 2011 at 12:58 pm Sarah said:
Alison, it ain't gonna go away, so get on with it. Most people are 'just getting on with it'. Why can't you? On 19 July 2011 at 2:17 pm Peter Barker said:
Can I ask one thing Mel, please stop calling it a regime, it has all the implications of a totalitarian Mugabesque dictatorship. Not a good way to get the natives on board. On 21 July 2011 at 1:33 pm Mel Hewitson said:
Hi Peter
How about 'new professional era'? I agree the tone should be positive.
Cheers
Mel
On 22 July 2011 at 10:46 am Peter Barker said:
Mel, that sounds perfect to me.
Thanks for that, I feel uplifted already.
Peter
On 26 July 2011 at 8:21 am Paraqnormal said:
No I think "regime" is more accurate. A huge imposition of Mugabesque bureaucracy for no real gain to the consumer is a very accurate description. Commenting is closed
Printable version | Email to a friend |
Why don't they just access advisor's SSC papers rather than asking them to repeat the process ?