News
LAQC proposals questionable: NZICA
Monday 31st of May 2010
As part of the Budget process, the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) has proposed limiting the use of LAQCs to reduce the overall tax paid by property investors and others. The department's Policy Advice Division released for comment Qualifying companies: Implementation of flow-through tax treatment, which makes the following proposals:
- The distinction between a qualifying company (QC) and an LAQC will be removed. There will be only QCs that will be allowed only one class of share.
- QCs will be taxed similarly to a limited partnership, not a company, with the income and losses flowing through to shareholders in a QC in proportion to their "effective interest" (generally a shareholder's voting interest).
- A loss limitation rule will be imposed. Losses will be able to be claimed by a shareholder in a QC but the amount will be limited to the value of that person's investment in the QC. Excess losses may be carried forward and utilised when the shareholder's investment in the company increases.
- Amounts derived from the QC will retain their character in the shareholder's hands; that is, capital distributions will be treated as a capital receipt by the shareholder and revenue distributions will be treated as income.
- The dividend and imputation rules will not apply to a QC.
- Shareholders in a QC will no longer be personally liable for the company's income tax when electing to become a QC.
- A shareholder will be required to account for tax on disposing of their interest in a QC only if the value of the proceeds from the disposal exceeds the total net tax book value of their share of company property by more than $50,000. The same exceptions to this rule that apply to partnerships will also apply to shareholders in a QC.
- There will be a deemed disposition and reacquisition at market value of the company's assets when the company ceases to be a QC. The shareholder will therefore be required to account for tax on the disposal of their share of the QC's property.
- On liquidation of a QC a shareholder of a QC will be treated as having disposed of and reacquired all of their interest in the company at market value.
- The QC will be required to file an IR 7 partnership income tax return.
- There will be no tax costs associated with an existing QC transitioning into the new QC rules.
Want to read the full article?
Click the button below to subscribe and will have free unlimited access for a limited time to full article and all other articles on the site.
You will also be able to comment on articles on Good Returns.
Latest News
5 min read
Latest Comments
Advisers embrace Westpac after trail commissions removed
@The Laird - No, not really. The headline of this article could equally have been: "Advisers embrace Westpac after upfront commissions increased to highest across the main banks."
2 hours ago Paul Flood
Advisers embrace Westpac after trail commissions removed
Doesn't this result call into question the criticism from certain quarters that Mortgage Advisers are driven predominantly by commission considerations?
8 hours ago The Laird
FMA wants clearer fees
@first time caller - I can see the complexity you highlight, but as above, investors should be able to see what they are paying without having to reference multiple documents. Investment admin can track and report deductions for tax, withdrawals, fees et al, would be /should be straightforward to aggregate advice fees into costs at member level... at least I hope so.
1 day ago Goldcard
FMA wants clearer fees
@goldcard - how would you propose that a fund manager calculates the TER to include adviser fees given not all clients pay them and different advisers charge different fees, not to mention some advisors charge different fees to different clients? The advice fee gets disclosed in the adviser's disclosure statement and the statement of advice, so the client can add that to the published TER of the fund they are invested in to see how much they are paying overall.
2 days ago First time caller
FMA wants clearer fees
Schedule 4 of the FMCA regs 2014, particularly clauses 2(1) and 53(3) provide the basis for excluding individually charged advice fees from the statutory TER. This was introduced with the best of intentions, but now it is little more than an invisibility cloak for deductions from member accounts.
2 days ago Goldcard