tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Monday, November 25th, 6:44PM

Investments

rss
Investment News

Are US Shares Cheap?

Whether global share markets now represent good value or not remains a hot topic.

Thursday, September 5th 2002, 12:19PM

Whether global share markets now represent good value or not remains a hot topic. Despite the US share market being down 40% from its March 2000 peak, many argue that it is still expensive and prone to further weakness. However, there is no universally agreed method for valuing shares - it is essentially a judgement call.

There appear to be two approaches in assessing US shares. Bearish assessments focus on absolute valuation measures, comparing share prices to fundamentals such as earnings, dividends or the book value. Bullish assessments tend to use relative value measures which allow for the current low level of interest rates and bond yields.

Absolutely overvalued….
The most common of the absolute valuation approaches is to compare share prices to reported earnings over the past year, then compare this to its long-term average. The price/earnings ratio (PE) on the US market is currently around 30 times - well above its 130-year average (see chart). Taking the 130-year average as fair value, on current earnings the US share market needs to halve before it can be considered fair value.


Variations on this approach allow for the current level of write-downs and thus focus on operating earnings. Others allow for the PE on US shares being inflated by a cyclical slump in US earnings and thus focus on trend or forward earnings. However, these variations still put the PE above its long-term average, suggesting US shares are expensive.

There are several problems with these approaches. First, such measures often deviate from their long-term averages for extended periods (up to 20 years), making them less useful as a short-term valuation tool. Measures like the PE tend to value the US market as expensive in the early/mid 1990s when the Dow Jones index was below 4000. They are best seen as a long-term guide only; when high (eg. late 1960s and more recently) they warn of a long future period of low returns, when low (eg. late 1970s/early 1980s) they warn of future high returns.

Second, their interpretation is made difficult by structural changes, eg. current low inflation can in large part explain high US PEs. High inflation creates earnings uncertainty and reduces the quality of reported earnings (as companies tend to under-allow for depreciation). Hence, high inflation periods are associated with low PEs and vice versa - as is currently the case.

Third, for most investors the issue is not whether the PE of the market is high relative to its long-term history, but rather whether shares look cheap compared to other investments.

Fourth, a return to a PE of 15 or below in the absence of rising inflation or sustained deflation would take the prospective return premium of US shares over bonds to implausibly high levels. We would need a serious and sustained economic deterioration to justify such a move.

...but relatively cheap
The other extreme is a comparison of the share market's earnings yield (the inverse of the PE) with bond yields. AMP Henderson has been using a variation of this approach since the late 1980s. The close relationship between the two in past years is apparent in the following chart (which uses consensus year ahead earnings expectations to calculate the earnings yield). It shows that earnings yields are low (PEs are high) because bond yields are low. Bond yields are now below the prospective earnings yield, indicating that US shares are cheap. This suggests that the US market is about 30% undervalued.


A similar picture is seen comparing cash returns with dividend yield. Allowing for share buy backs, the dividend yield on US shares is around 2.5% - above the available return on US money market accounts (generally below 1.5%).

Thus relative valuation indicators conclude that as long as US inflation, cash returns and bond yields remain low, the market will continue to trade on PE multiples above historic long-term averages. The current level of cash returns and bond yields suggest that the US market is extremely cheap.

This approach also has deficiencies. First, the relationship observed between bond yields and earnings yields is a phenomenon of the past 30 years - prior to this shares were mainly held for dividends rather than capital growth (see chart below). The risk is that after the experience of the past few years, investors may demand more certainty and insist on higher dividend yields.


Note: reported earnings have been used to construct earnings yield as data for prospective earnings is not available before the late 1970s.

Second, there is no theoretical reason why the earnings yield should move around the bond yield. Such a relationship assumes a constant long-term earnings growth rate, share risk premium and ratio of dividends to earnings.

Thirdly, current bond yields of near 4% in the US are not necessarily sustainable. If bond yields rise (prices fall), some of the value apparent in US shares will vanish.

Fourthly, the relationship could give misleading signals when inflation and bond yields are at very low levels. We are then flirting with deflation, which could be bad for shares if earnings are threatened.

Despite these shortcomings, the bond earnings yield approach has been a good indicator since the late 1970s.

So what is the answer?
Valuing shares is not easy - while all approaches have their shortcomings, we believe that:

·    The high level of US PEs provides a warning that long-term returns from US stocks will be constrained. Nevertheless, in the absence of a return to 1970s inflation or a deflationary shock, it is hard to see the PE on historic earnings falling back to pre 1960s norms.

·    In valuing shares investors can't ignore the yield or likely return on other assets. The bond earnings yield approach may overstate the attractive valuation of US shares. However, as shares are extremely cheap versus bonds on this measure, there is still likely to be more upside in US stocks on a six to 12 month horizon.

 

 

Source: AMP Henderson Global Investors, Investment Insights Newsletter, August 27, 2002

« The active/passive debate surfaces - againKing builds an empire »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend

Good Returns Investment Centre is brought to you by:

Subscribe Now

Keep up to date with the latest investment news
Subscribe to our newsletter today

Edison Investment Research
  • VietNam Holding
    21 November 2024
    First redemption tender a success
    VietNam Holding (VNH) delivered a 27.3% net asset value (NAV) per share total return over the last 12 months (ending 31 October) in sterling terms. The...
  • Murray Income Trust
    20 November 2024
    Income focus keeps paying dividends
    Murray Income Trust (MUT) invests in high-quality, mainly UK-listed stocks. MUT’s manager, Charles Luke, believes quality stocks are best placed...
  • Apax Global Alpha
    15 November 2024
    Transaction activity picked up in Q324
    Apax Global Alpha (AGA) reported a Q324 NAV total return (TR) of 1.7% in euro terms on a constant currency basis (-0.2% including fx changes), with a 3...
© 2024 Edison Investment Research.

View more research papers »

Today's Best Bank Rates
Rabobank 5.25  
Based on a $50,000 deposit
More Rates »
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com