tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Saturday, December 28th, 10:36AM

Investments

rss
Latest Headlines

S&P checks Equitable's ratings

Credit rating agency Standard & Poor's expects Equitable Mortgages will meet the central bank's capital requirement when it finally announces its prudential regime for non-bank deposit takers, and has reaffirmed the finance company's BB rating.

Tuesday, September 15th 2009, 4:23PM

by Paul McBeth

S&P said Equitable Mortgages is a central part of the wider Equitable group and retained its BB rating, meeting the criteria of the government's extension to the retail deposit guarantee, due to its emphasis on first-mortgage lending and the cornerstone shareholding of the Spencer family.

The rating agency does not think Equitable will require additional shareholder support to meet the Reserve Bank's expected 8% capital requirement, but if this fails to be the case, it predicts the Spencer family will inject enough money into the business to ensure that it does.

"Standard & Poor's believes that the Spencer family is committed to a strategic long-term ownership of Equitable, and will provide capital support to business growth," S&P analyst Mark Legge said in his report. 

Still, the rating agency, which downgraded Equitable to BB from BB+ in March, said the company has weak assets as the commercial property market continues to deteriorate, and has seen general arrears rising substantially over the past few years.

There was a "significant counterparty credit exposure with the top six such exposures account for close to 60% of the Equitable's loan book as at May 31," and its largest single-party exposure was for $29.6 million.

"Pressure on Equitable's financial profile given that unfavourable economic conditions may further increase arrears and delay realisation of poor quality assets" resulted in the company remaining on a negative outlook, the report said.

The rating agency raised concerns about the finance company's trustee setting a maximum counterparty loan limit of 10% of Equitable group's total tangible assets, and said it translates into individual exposures of around 100% of the group's tangible equity.

S&P said the finance company had been reducing the number of poor quality loans it has on its books, and could be well-placed to resume growth when commercial property stabilises.

Equitable was pleased to retain the rating, calling it a "positive achievement" given the stage of the market cycle.

"Our liquidity position is strengthening and we are managing our funds under management at a relatively stable level of approximately $250 million," said group product and marketing manager Andrew Mexted-Bragg in a statement. "While challenges remain in the industry, the shareholder, directors and executive of Equitable are of a view that we will emerge from the current cycle with a more robust business."

 

 

Paul is a staff writer for Good Returns based in Wellington.

« PSIS launches new PIE fundSouth Canterbury ceases debenture allotments »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Today's Best Bank Rates
Rabobank 5.25  
Based on a $50,000 deposit
More Rates »
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • The good guys get told off
    “Very prudent points as always @JohnMilner. Whilst I don’t disagree with the process, I question any advantages from the...”
    4 days ago by Pragmatic
  • [The Wrap] The year that was - and what may happen next year
    “Hope you have a good recovery Phil. Interesting points 1.Box ticking already happening with SOA 's that look identical...”
    6 days ago by Very Frustrated Adviser
  • [The Wrap] The year that was - and what may happen next year
    “Nice summary Phil. In short: . Consumers will expect more from the industry for less . Advisers will be increasingly time...”
    6 days ago by Pragmatic
  • The good guys get told off
    “I can't quite reconcile the rationale, or lack thereof, with the comments so far. Pathfinder were found to have made misleading...”
    8 days ago by John Milner
  • The good guys get told off
    “As a follow on to this conversation: I'm assuming that the Regulator will be consistent by 'naming and shaming' the other...”
    8 days ago by Pragmatic
Subscribe Now

Deposit Rates newsletter

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com