tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Tuesday, November 26th, 10:06AM

Insurance

rss
Latest Headlines

Court of Appeal reserves decision on Tower ANZ battle

The Court of Appeal has reserved its decision on the legal battle between ANZ National and Tower Insurance over $70 million of premium income.  

Thursday, April 1st 2010, 1:39PM

The battle is for insurance ownership of 110,000 customers representing 196,000 general insurance policies.

Tower provided fire and general insurance products to the ANZ and National Bank of New Zealand for 15 years and this allowed Tower to benefit from the ANZ National Bank brands and to access to its 1.2 million customers.

The benefit ANZ National Bank had from the arrangement was the ability to offer a one-stop insurance service as well as a commission for each policy sold with a share in Tower's profits.

But in 2005 ANZ National decided to take on Vero as its new general insurance products underwriter and the agreement with Tower was terminated.

ANZ National Bank claims Tower could continue to administer the existing policies until they came up for the annual renewal, but could not renew them.

However, Tower has refused to give up control of the customers signed up under the old agreement which make up about a third of its premium income.

Tower has continued to renew policies as they fall due using the bank's insurance brands, ANZ Cover and National Bank Master Cover.

In March last year the High Court ruled in Tower's favour, saying that when Tower sold a policy to a bank customer, the customer also became a Tower customer.

BusinessDay reported that much of the argument was around how key clauses in the agreement should be interpreted.

Court of Appeal president Sir William Young repeatedly criticised the standard of the wording in the documents and said "it is possibly a waste of time to try and make sense of the agreement".

Justice Susan Glazebrook said the agreement's failure to spell out explicitly how existing policies were to be dealt with on renewal after the alliance ended meant the court was not going to find "a smoking gun" to indicate which side was in the right.

 

« Sovereign takes advantage of medical advancementsPrudential says it plans to retain AIA Australia »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Chubb's latest champion
Young maths prodigy takes out actuarial award.

New book: Unlocking group insurance
Christchurch adviser Corey Williams has released a new book helping advisers and employers put group insurance schemes in place.

Insurer gets warning from RBNZ
Geneva Finance's insurance subsidiary Quest Insurance been given a warning from the prudential regulator.

Big Shout Out
We wanted to give a Big Shout Out to Jack Newman for his fund raising efforts over the weekend.

News Bites
Latest Comments
Subscribe Now

Cover Notes - Specific news aimed at risk advisers

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com
x