tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Wednesday, December 25th, 8:49AM

Insurance

rss
Latest Headlines

ISI: We have not flip flopped on policy

The ISI says it has not flip flopped on policy, but it has made a simple suggestion to consult on the new Business Replacement Rules and Reinstatement guidelines because they didn't reflect the right intent, engagement and communication.

Wednesday, July 28th 2010, 10:48AM 3 Comments

by Jenha White

The guidelines were issued on 1 July, followed by an announcement five days later saying the ISI was prepared to consider making improvements after hearing concern in feedback from advisers.

"Reports in the press say we have flip flopped on the policy. We haven't flip flopped," said ISI chairman Sean Carroll at last weeks Institute of Financial Advisers (IFA) conference.

He also stated that the policy is not about churning or reducing distribution costs.

"The ISI is concerned about clients being disadvantaged in unfortunate cases where benefits under a replaced policy would have triggered a successful claim, but the new one did not."

The Association believes people have the right to replace their policies, but it wants to be sure they are basing those decisions on all the facts.

"We want transparency and a check on that process, we aim to re-engage with adviser groups to try and get consistency around it because we do need to get this right," said Carroll.

 

Jenha is a TPL staff reporter. jenha@tarawera.co.nz

« UPDATED: ISI changes anti-churning policy after meeting advisersTower wants blokes to 'man up' »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 28 July 2010 at 11:58 am Note Bene said:
I am really interested in the legality of an industry body making commercial decisions after collaberation with all members. In my mind this is a 'cartel' Definition •A cartel is a formal (explicit) agreement among competing firms. It is a formal organization of producers that agree to coordinate prices, marketing and production.

Interesting...
On 29 July 2010 at 8:00 am Bill said:
Here in NZ the word is "Jandal".
On 30 July 2010 at 11:11 am John Smith said:
You have to ask what the ISI was trying to achieve apart from just trying to look like they were doing something to impress the government.
Will it reduce churn? No
Will it reduce replacement of business? No
Will it really benefit the client? No
What it will do:
Increase the appointment time with the client
Confuse the client
Create extra work for advisers and Life Companies

You have to wonder about the people who are on the ICI. I think the saying is true… the higher up you are the less oxygen you get.
Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Partners exits Adviser Support Programme
Partners Life has moved its Adviser Support Programme to a third party compliance provider.

Apex Advice buys life business
Auckland-based Apex Advice has acquired a well-established insurance advice business.

Chubb's latest champion
Young maths prodigy takes out actuarial award.

New book: Unlocking group insurance
Christchurch adviser Corey Williams has released a new book helping advisers and employers put group insurance schemes in place.

News Bites
Latest Comments
  • The good guys get told off
    “Very prudent points as always @JohnMilner. Whilst I don’t disagree with the process, I question any advantages from the...”
    3 days ago by Pragmatic
  • [The Wrap] The year that was - and what may happen next year
    “Hope you have a good recovery Phil. Interesting points 1.Box ticking already happening with SOA 's that look identical...”
    4 days ago by Very Frustrated Adviser
  • [The Wrap] The year that was - and what may happen next year
    “Nice summary Phil. In short: . Consumers will expect more from the industry for less . Advisers will be increasingly time...”
    4 days ago by Pragmatic
  • The good guys get told off
    “I can't quite reconcile the rationale, or lack thereof, with the comments so far. Pathfinder were found to have made misleading...”
    6 days ago by John Milner
  • The good guys get told off
    “As a follow on to this conversation: I'm assuming that the Regulator will be consistent by 'naming and shaming' the other...”
    7 days ago by Pragmatic
Subscribe Now

Cover Notes - Specific news aimed at risk advisers

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com
x