tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Friday, December 27th, 9:33PM

Insurance

rss
Latest Headlines

Insurance treated as a commodity

If your broking service looks the same as everyone else's, then your results will as well. There is a reason that most people are in the middle - it's because it is safe there.

Monday, February 14th 2011, 4:45PM

by Russell Hutchinson

When you first started in this business you probably found it hard to get going. Some of the things necessary for success were things you didn't really want to do - it does take time to get used to selling. So the early years were often a gradual process of finding out what other people do that works and learning how to do it yourself. Hence: the "crowded middle".

That was all very well when you could double your income by achieving the average. Now you have got there and you want to double your income again you have to unlearn half of the way you were taught to do business in the first place. The attitudes, skills, and knowledge that will take you to the very top are not the same as those that took you to the "middle". They can't be - there aren't many people at the top and they aren't all just doing the same as the rest, only "more and harder".

Take your service as an insurance broker. I've seen plenty of broker's sales presentations over the years - and even more of the written reports that go with them. They aren't very different, surprisingly.

Sometimes I hear people talk about how unfair it is that people treat insurance like a commodity - and how it isn't a commodity. But what I don't often see is the passion for the important differences in the insurance contracts. I don't often see the passion for telling the story about the relative risks. I don't often see the well-told story about the claims services provided by one insurer over another. The simple fact is, if you treat insurance as a commodity, then your clients certainly will. Clients actually don't really want commodities. Most opt for individuality where they can - they like to see the unique beauty in their home, garden, the bikes they ride, the telephones they use and the clothes they wear. Somehow you have got to tap into the novelty-seeking idea and create more involvement in the product - that way, you'll have relevant differentiation, and you will cease to play a price comparison game.

« What’s Not Covered?Claims – quantifying an approach »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Partners exits Adviser Support Programme
Partners Life has moved its Adviser Support Programme to a third party compliance provider.

Apex Advice buys life business
Auckland-based Apex Advice has acquired a well-established insurance advice business.

Chubb's latest champion
Young maths prodigy takes out actuarial award.

New book: Unlocking group insurance
Christchurch adviser Corey Williams has released a new book helping advisers and employers put group insurance schemes in place.

News Bites
Latest Comments
  • The good guys get told off
    “Very prudent points as always @JohnMilner. Whilst I don’t disagree with the process, I question any advantages from the...”
    3 days ago by Pragmatic
  • [The Wrap] The year that was - and what may happen next year
    “Hope you have a good recovery Phil. Interesting points 1.Box ticking already happening with SOA 's that look identical...”
    5 days ago by Very Frustrated Adviser
  • [The Wrap] The year that was - and what may happen next year
    “Nice summary Phil. In short: . Consumers will expect more from the industry for less . Advisers will be increasingly time...”
    5 days ago by Pragmatic
  • The good guys get told off
    “I can't quite reconcile the rationale, or lack thereof, with the comments so far. Pathfinder were found to have made misleading...”
    7 days ago by John Milner
  • The good guys get told off
    “As a follow on to this conversation: I'm assuming that the Regulator will be consistent by 'naming and shaming' the other...”
    8 days ago by Pragmatic
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com