Quality commissions attract quality advisers, says Ballantyne
Partners Life managing director Naomi Ballantyne has taken a swipe at insurers’ who allow their products to be sold at discounted rates online.
Monday, February 13th 2012, 12:10PM 10 Comments
by Benn Bathgate
Sovereign recently told its adviser force that to compete with its products lower premium rates on the Warehouse website, they could reduce their commission and pass the saving on to the client - known as variable commission.
"Forcing advisers to reduce their commissions down from the standard offering in order to compete with their own direct offering is not something Partners Life intends to do to our advisers."
"We want our clients to be well advised, well serviced and well supported at claims time so we pay the commissions that we think will attract and retain quality advisers," she said.
"If the insurer doesn't believe that their standard commission is appropriate for the work their advisers do then they should change their offering and allow advisers to make informed decisions about whether to support that company or not."
Fidelity Life chief executive Milton Jennings said some of the websites that sell their products do so on a reduced commission, enabling them to offer cheaper premiums.
He said that they offer advisers "tonnes of variety" around commission, but that he believed the advice proposition was about more than premium costs.
"Most of them [advisers] shouldn't be competing on price but service and the advice they give."
AIA head of distribution Darrin Franks said that while relatively rare, advisers did opt for variable commission on occasion.
"The ones [advisers] that can't demonstrate the value for the commission they earn may do," he said.
Benn Bathgate is a business reporter for ASSET and Good Returns, email story ideas to benn@goodreturns.co.nz
« HFANZ renews call for health insurance tax breaks | Sovereign says new adviser regulations hit sales in 2011 » |
Special Offers
Comments from our readers
Does this mean that she will not allow any advisers with Partners Agencies to have discounted rates on websites, or to discount commissions to clients.
Sounds like Haakie was being tongue in cheek and everyone else is believing.
A client receives advice, and a cheaper premium by an adviser choosing to reduce their commission.
The ability to reduce commission to attract a cheaper premium has been in the market for years. It’s not just a Partners Life specific, as agreed to by Milton Jennings and Darren Franks.
I know a number of advisers who will reduce commission to attract a cheaper premium for longstanding clients, and in some cases, new clients who need cover, but are price sensitive. How is that a bad thing, and how does that encourage churn?
I would have thought an adviser should be applauded for offering advice, and if need be, willing to sacrifice some of their income stream to make sure a client is able to afford the cover they need. Some obviously see this as an awful thing for the industry.
Perhaps the folks in Smales Farm have a short memory (as does it also appear to some of our colleges in the industry) that advice may have averted a one legged painter from not receiving a payout. I guess that client had the someone in Sovereigns call centre fighting their case with Sovereign claims?
I agree with Milton that premium cost is one part of the equation. A question though. If the site he refers to offers reduced commission to the adviser and this offers a cheaper premium to the client, then how does that differ from Partners Life allowing advisers to reduce commission?
I’m afraid that while utopia would mean every person has a broad risk plan, affordability is an issue and rather than focus on commission, focus on what we are here to do as an industry, and that is make sure we solve the underinsurance problem in New Zealand, while at the same time, making sure that we protect the consumer with adequate cover and a sense of compassion at time of claim, (which I just don’t see happening with non-advice product).
Yes the internet may drive cheaper costs to bring the business on the books for insurers, but what price when it goes wrong and there is no one to defend the little guy.
‘Hakkie’ may have jested about dropping commission, but if it is true that the product offering is inferior through the Warehouse (and is generally the case through internet sales), then are those who use internet based product sales being offered a dis-service, and when it goes belly up at time of claim, we as an industry, suffer the consequences.
when i go to harvey norman or the warehouse or pak n save and ask for discount....do i get it....yea exactly!!
I also suspect that disclosure of commissions and justifying your value will be easy for some and sticky for others. However, it is pleasing to see growing professionalism and focus on client best interests in insurance advisers, typically the younger ones.
Commenting is closed
Printable version | Email to a friend |