Fund managers call for level playing field

Mutual recognition has failed New Zealand fund managers who still face considerable cost to distribute their products in Australia, a review of financial regulations has been told.

Saturday, March 2nd 2013, 10:00AM 1 Comment

by Niko Kloeten

The review of Financial Market Conduct Regulations asked industry participants about a number of issues, including whether New Zealand should pursue mutual recognition with other countries besides Australia.

A joint submission by boutique managers Pathfinder Asset Management and Pie Funds has questioned whether New Zealand would benefit from such a move.

“In the case of Australia mutual recognition was entered into with the best intentions but has failed from a New Zealand perspective,” said the submission, citing a 35:1 disparity in the number of Australian offers into New Zealand versus New Zealand offers into Australia.

“There are several reason for this huge disparity – one is that the regulatory environment in Australia places hurdles for NZ fund managers that Australian managers do not face in New Zealand.

“The cost of these extra hurdles is circa A$100,000 to A$200,000 per annum for a NZ fund manager to distribute product into Australia. There is not true mutuality.”

Pathfinder executive director John Berry said the cost was due to New Zealand fund managers having to distribute and promote their products through an Australian licence-holder.

“It’s a barrier to entry to the market. We’ve welcomed Australian fund managers here but they haven’t given us reciprocity.”

The submission also called for offshore fund managers to have the same level of disclosure as New Zealand managers, including Australian unit trusts available here under mutual recognition.

“They currently operate under secrecy in New Zealand – they do not disclose how much they have raised from New Zealand investors.

“We find this unfortunate as many New Zealand investors derive comfort from the fact an Australian fund may be large – they do not realise they may be an early adopter of the fund in New Zealand.”

Niko Kloeten can be contacted at niko@goodreturns.co.nz

« The start of the end for Fisher Funds?

IFA working on pro-bono offering »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 11 March 2013 at 8:18 am Clayton Coplestone said:

Whether the licensing regime provides a barrier to entry or not, Australia is the most over-supplied financial services jurisdiction globally, with NZ managers unable to offer much that isn’t already available. On the other hand, the New Zealand industry has a significant disadvantage with a thin offering of investment capabilities. Australian managers have been quick to realise the opportunity that exists in New Zealand, and are providing skills & abilities that otherwise do not exist.

Sign In to add your comment