FMA: We don't expect many personalised DIMS authorisations
Just a handful of authorised financial advisers are likely to be able to offer personalised discretionary investment management services (DIMS) after the middle of next year, the Financial Markets Authority says.
Wednesday, November 26th 2014, 6:00AM 13 Comments
by Susan Edmunds
Under the new Financial Markets Conduct Act (FMCA), all providers of DIMS will have to be licensed to offer class DIMS, or authorised under the Financial Advisers Act (FAA) to offer personalised DIMS.
Director of compliance Elaine Campbell said the FMA’s understanding was that very few AFAs were providing a personalised DIMS service at present. The majority were using a model portfolio. “Personalised DIMS is a bespoke investment strategy that moves clients so far away from the underlying model portfolio that it is truly bespoke for the one client and his or her needs.”
She expected at most 20 or 30 might be authorised to provide DIMS under the FAA once the new regime kicks in.
The FMA is expecting to licence about 200 AFAs for class DIMS.
But Campbell said those 200 licenses could cover more advisers as it would be the company that is licensed, not each individual adviser. “Large advisory houses may have a number of AFAs working for them who would then not need to seek out their own authorisation or licence.”
Those who offered personalised and class DIMS would only need the license, not authorisation, to do both so the number authorised to offer only personalised DIMS could be eroded further.
Campbell said the standard required of advisers would be the same across class and personalised DIMS so there was no benefit to the adviser in avoiding being licensed. “The eligibility standards have been drafted to ensure people can’t arbitrage between the two regimes.”
She said whether advisers wanted to be licensed or to carry on offering personalised DIMS, they had to take some action by the middle of next year. Those who want to apply for a license for class DIMS must do so by the end of May 31 to take advantage of transitional provisions.
Those who want to offer personalised DIMS under the FAA, even if they are currently authorised to do so, were required to file a new ABS by the same date. Campbell said: “If someone wishes to continue to provide personalised DIMS, we need to be satisfied that person meets the new eligibility criteria the law sets out.”
If advisers had previously indicated they were offering DIMS and did not apply for a license or authorisation, they would come in for regulatory scrutiny.
Some advisers have said it will not be worth offering DIMS under the new rules. But Campbell said people should not make business decisions based on regulatory change. “If you believe it is in the best interests of your client that you do not perform the service and the client sources the service elsewhere, that’s a discussion between the AFA and the client. We would be concerned if the AFA was changing their business model in response to changes in regulatory settings. Advisers performing DIMS to a high standard should be confident that they can meet the criteria.”
She said the licence criteria were flexible to reflect the processes of smaller businesses.
Campbell said while there was always room for improvement, she felt the FMA had handled the DIMS process well. “Within the constraints we have had, we did endeavour to engage extensively.”
She said the FMA would continue to consult and make itself available to help people understand where their services might fit under the new regime.
« Adviser designations need attention: Scott | RFAs watch out, the FMA is coming » |
Special Offers
Comments from our readers
But still no words on simple DIMs that a lot of us might use ?
I won't change my business model aka "trying hard to do right by my clients" but due to the DIMs paper mountain, I may change HOW I work so I have some time left to do so
Regards
Brent
Methinks you should have another look at the definition of wholesale in the FMCAct. Its not the same as in the FAAct.
A wholesale client for "advice" is not necessarily a wholesale client for "DIMS".
I would like to repeat a question I asked earlier in a much more direct form. What is the exact regulation in the new regulations that is authority for that position
My reading of the transitional provisions is that if you haven't supplied a new ABS by 31 May 2015, the new investment authority and reporting requirements apply from 1 June.
But nowhere do I see the new regs say that all AFAs with an existing DIMS authorisation have to provide an updated ABS by 31 May as the story states.
Surely the law should be applied as it is written.
And while I have my keyboard open, has anyone else thought there is something mighty strange with the method to be used (according to both the license and authorisation regulations) for reporting returns to DIMS clients? If no takers to this teaser in 48hrs, I might just give a clue.
My issue is only in relation to AFA personalised DIMS authorisation.
It is clear you can't offer a Class DIMS after 1 Jun 2015 unless you have applied for a licence by 31 May 2015.
Sorry about any confusion I created.
http://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2013/0069/latest/DLM4092471.html
I don't see any reference to it being different for a DIMS
To me this is taking the proverbial in the first degree.
My guess is that there lots claiming that clients make the decisions, when in reality they are simply rubber stamping the adviser's decisions.
I concede the point where specified financial products are concerned.
I had in mind the "large" investor wholesale exemption where the net assets required are only $1 million in FAAct, but are $5 million in FMCAct (Schedule 1 s 39 -the next section to the one you have quoted.)
My general warning that not all clients who are wholesale for FAA are wholesale for FMC still stands though.
Sign In to add your comment
Printable version | Email to a friend |