Advised sales get more claims paid
If you ever read the comments on articles about insurance in mainstream media, you could be forgiven for thinking that no insurer ever paid a claim.
Thursday, October 13th 2016, 6:00PM 
3 Comments
by Russell Hutchinson
The Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) decided they would conduct their own investigation and see what was happening. In spite of some efforts to make it sound terrible, the level of claims payment is good if a comparison is possible, with, say the UK. What’s more, sales made by advisers tended to have more claims paid than those made direct.
- Overall 90% of claims are paid
- Claim decline rates were: 4% for life, 7% for income protection, 14% for trauma, and 16% for TPD
ASIC are worried about the TPD figure. I looked at the income protection figure and thought it was very low for declines. It would be very interesting to see the data for New Zealand. I am worried that our figures won’t look as good – especially for TPD – where some advisers and their staff have told me stories about claims which concern me a great deal. Even more so, because I have TPD insurance.
I hope that our regulators contemplate a similar investigation. But the industry, of course, does not have to wait to be told. In the UK the Association of British Insurers developed common claims reporting standards and encouraged members to release data as a way of boosting confidence in the insurance market. We should do the same. I am willing to bet that showing consumers that we pay claims is a more effective way of growing the market than always nagging potential customers about underinsurance.
There are many causes for disputes about claims, but ASIC’s work lists the main ones. The single largest wasn’t non-disclosure, it was requests for evidence. Perhaps, when ASIC gets around to taking a more detailed look, that will amount to the same thing. The second-most common cause for complaint was delay. Between them these issues accounted for nearly half of all claims problems. Some of them will be fixable. Having ASIC interested probably makes them more fixable. So this is a good review on the part of the regulator.
If you are an adviser, you will like this part of the media release:
“ASIC's review also found that there were higher claims denial rates in relation to insurance policies sold direct to consumers with no financial advice (compared to policies sold through advisers and group insurance policies).”
Customers might ask themselves why. The causes are likely to be several but I suggest fully underwritten cover, broader coverage, and lower premiums (which enable you to buy more) as contributing factors. Advisers can also help reduce those arguments over evidence and expedite the process for you when you experience delays.
| « Are things you never use worth buying? | Things we should stop doing » |
Special Offers
Comments from our readers
Over the last 35 years in the industry, we have had almost as many successful claims admitted for TPD as we have had for Life Cover. Admittedly, in two instances we had to provide extremely strong advocacy on behalf of our client (to the extent that we paid for independent specialist medical reports) to get the Claim Admitted.
And yes, strong advocacy and independent reports are often necessary for TPD claims. Also some claims may not be paid because of inadequate knowledge between all parties.
Sign In to add your comment
|
|
Printable version |
|
Email to a friend |
As for direct product distribution, upfront underwriting is typically less robust and more will be done at claim time - increasing claim disputes as ASIC has found.