tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Friday, December 27th, 9:33PM

Insurance

rss
Latest Headlines

Buying insurance cover for adult children

Should people buy their kids first insurance package?

Tuesday, June 6th 2017, 12:03PM

by Russell Hutchinson

I’m not talking about young children, rather, children between the ages of 18 and whenever they finally launch into life on their own.

Maybe you debated hard whether to help buy your kids their first car. Parents make numerous compromises about this. I know one that pays for WOF, Rego and repairs, because they always want the car to be safe, but leaves the other stuff with the child to sort out. Another one adds them to their own insurance policy because it makes it cheaper for them. Some charge them, some don’t and so on.

Medical insurance is the first stop, and in among all the expenses of sending a child to University or other further education, many parents keep up medical coverage for their kids if they can afford to do so. Even this can be calibrated to be not such a burden. A measure of self-insurance may be applied. The most commonly selected excess level is now $500, and $1,000 is hardly a problem for many people when the item at stake is surgery that might cost $30,000, or drugs that might cost $100,000.

Few think of life insurance, trauma, or income protection. But the cover, at 18, is so cheap that if there is a little room in the budget for including this, I would argue strongly for it. The first reason is to inoculate your child against the kind of insurance sold alongside hire-purchase or lending. Young people often borrow: for appliances for a shared flat, for a car, for all sorts of things. With that loan someone will try to sell them some loan protection insurance. The second reason is that almost any coverage bought in that way will probably be very expensive, very poor coverage. Better than nothing, that’s true, but when better cover can be had for a lot less money, you’d be mad to settle for it. The last reason is that you will think of it, because you have probably seen more of life. They may not, because at 18, you think you’re bulletproof.

So, why not buy them a small, basic package of cover? Better yet, buy it on a level premium – see how low it is at 18 years old. Then they can reject all the proffered loan protection plans until they need quite a lot more cover. They can take over paying for the package when they leave university and get a job.

Tags: Russell Hutchinson

« How do we change what ‘most people know’?Unhappy Customers »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Partners exits Adviser Support Programme
Partners Life has moved its Adviser Support Programme to a third party compliance provider.

Apex Advice buys life business
Auckland-based Apex Advice has acquired a well-established insurance advice business.

Chubb's latest champion
Young maths prodigy takes out actuarial award.

New book: Unlocking group insurance
Christchurch adviser Corey Williams has released a new book helping advisers and employers put group insurance schemes in place.

News Bites
Latest Comments
  • The good guys get told off
    “Very prudent points as always @JohnMilner. Whilst I don’t disagree with the process, I question any advantages from the...”
    4 days ago by Pragmatic
  • [The Wrap] The year that was - and what may happen next year
    “Hope you have a good recovery Phil. Interesting points 1.Box ticking already happening with SOA 's that look identical...”
    5 days ago by Very Frustrated Adviser
  • [The Wrap] The year that was - and what may happen next year
    “Nice summary Phil. In short: . Consumers will expect more from the industry for less . Advisers will be increasingly time...”
    5 days ago by Pragmatic
  • The good guys get told off
    “I can't quite reconcile the rationale, or lack thereof, with the comments so far. Pathfinder were found to have made misleading...”
    7 days ago by John Milner
  • The good guys get told off
    “As a follow on to this conversation: I'm assuming that the Regulator will be consistent by 'naming and shaming' the other...”
    8 days ago by Pragmatic
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com