tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Friday, December 27th, 9:33PM

Insurance

rss
Latest Headlines

Commission disclosure no big deal for good advisers

Insurers expect little to change if advisers are required to disclose to their clients what commissions they are paid.

Monday, July 2nd 2018, 6:00AM

by Susan Edmunds

The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) is considering submissions received in response to a discussion paper on disclosure requirements for financial advice.

These will come into force with the new advice regime, which will introduce a level playing field for all financial advisers. At present, only AFAs have disclosure requirements.

Financial Advice NZ argued that it was the cost of the advice channel that should be disclosed, not individual advisers' commission.

MBIE suggested that advisers tell their clients what commission they received - and asked whether that should be done in dollar terms.

Partners Life managing director Naomi Ballantyne said it would put pressure on advisers who tried to obscure what they were paid. But she said it was a good conversation to have with clients, anyway.

Sometimes the insurer that paid the highest commission would also be the one that would have the best-priced policies or the best claims processes for clients, she said.

If an adviser could not demonstrate the policy was the best one for the client, as well as paying the highest commission, then the adviser was probably not giving good advice, anyway.

Graeme Edwards, executive general manager at AIA, said he had been told by AFAs that their clients had no problem with their fees and charges, when they were explained to them.

"Clients didn't have an issue with it because they have that trusted relationship. You go to lawyers, all the other professions and you don't tend to go into a big discussion about their fees ... good advisers have that trust."

If a client changed their minds based on disclosure of fees or commission that would indicate a problem with that relationship.

Other professions also paid commissions and offered incentives, he said. Their impact on advice was sometimes exaggerated, he said.

"I don't see this affecting the vast majority of advisers who do a good job and have that relationship."

Tags: Commission Disclosure

« FSCL warns: Roboadvice creates non-disclosure riskAIA completes Sovereign deal »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Partners exits Adviser Support Programme
Partners Life has moved its Adviser Support Programme to a third party compliance provider.

Apex Advice buys life business
Auckland-based Apex Advice has acquired a well-established insurance advice business.

Chubb's latest champion
Young maths prodigy takes out actuarial award.

New book: Unlocking group insurance
Christchurch adviser Corey Williams has released a new book helping advisers and employers put group insurance schemes in place.

News Bites
Latest Comments
  • The good guys get told off
    “Very prudent points as always @JohnMilner. Whilst I don’t disagree with the process, I question any advantages from the...”
    4 days ago by Pragmatic
  • [The Wrap] The year that was - and what may happen next year
    “Hope you have a good recovery Phil. Interesting points 1.Box ticking already happening with SOA 's that look identical...”
    5 days ago by Very Frustrated Adviser
  • [The Wrap] The year that was - and what may happen next year
    “Nice summary Phil. In short: . Consumers will expect more from the industry for less . Advisers will be increasingly time...”
    5 days ago by Pragmatic
  • The good guys get told off
    “I can't quite reconcile the rationale, or lack thereof, with the comments so far. Pathfinder were found to have made misleading...”
    8 days ago by John Milner
  • The good guys get told off
    “As a follow on to this conversation: I'm assuming that the Regulator will be consistent by 'naming and shaming' the other...”
    8 days ago by Pragmatic
Subscribe Now

Cover Notes - Specific news aimed at risk advisers

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com
x