tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Saturday, December 21st, 2:19PM

News

rss
Latest Headlines

Meth assumptions shaken by new report

New recommendations on safe meth levels will impact on the habitability levels landlords need to consider in contamination situations, a tenancy expert says.

Friday, October 28th 2016, 10:00AM

by Miriam Bell

A new Ministry of Health funded report recommends that different levels should be used to assess properties where meth has been used and properties where the drug has been manufactured.

The current Ministry guidelines set the meth contamination limit at 0.5 micrograms per 100cm2.

This limit has come under increasing fire as it is supposed to be applied in situations where meth has been manufactured in a property rather than where it has been used recreationally.

In fact, the contamination limit should be three to four times higher in cases of recreational meth use, according to the new report.

It recommends that in properties where meth has only been used there should be a limit of 1.5 micrograms per 100cm2 in carpeted properties and 2.0 micrograms per 100cm2 in uncarpeted properties.

But in properties where meth has been manufactured the 0.5 limit should remain.

The different contamination limits reflect the different levels of health risk.

While living in a meth lab environment has serious health risks, living in properties where there has only been meth use means there is a much reduced risk of toxicity.

Among landlords, confusion has been rife over the levels at which meth traces become a health hazard.

The situation has been made worse by a proliferation of meth testing and remediation companies – some of whom take advantage of worried landlords who are unsure what test results mean or require

Tenancy.co.nz director Scotney Williams said the proposed new levels would not mean a huge change for landlords when it came to dealing with meth contamination situations.

But they would make a difference in terms of the habitability levels landlords have to consider in such situations.

The proposed new levels mean tenants could consent to live in a property with a reading of up to 1.5, which is a level much higher than it is at the moment, he said.

“Currently, the Tenancy Tribunal says there is an unhabitability problem if there is a meth reading over 0.5. And, if you are under it, there is still an expectation of compensation if a property is not classed as reasonably clean and tidy.”

This means that a change from 0.5 to 1.5 will make it easier for landlords as far as the cut-off point as far as unhabitability goes, Williams said.

“If they were to get a level of 0.8, they would still have to decide if they wanted to clean it up or not, but a tenant could choose to stay in the property if it had a meth reading of 0.8 if they wanted to.

“The degree of remediation in such cases would be a judgement call on the part of the landlord, but they might be less such expenditure as a tenant could consent to live in a property if the reading was below 1.5.”

But Williams said if the proposed recommendations are adopted his advice to landlords would remain the same: test before and after tenancies and clean to the level required.

The new recommendations will be considered by the Standards New Zealand appointed committee which is developing a new meth testing and remediation standard.

The draft of the standard will be released for public consultation in November and the finalised standard is expected to be ready in early 2017.

However, the new recommendations have already led to controversy for Housing New Zealand.

The organisation now stands accused of unfairly evicting tenants for meth contamination – despite being warned it was misusing the existing guidelines to do so. 

Housing New Zealand CEO Andrew McKenzie said the new recommendations provide a clearer distinction between meth use and meth lab contamination.

"For some time, there has only been one set of guidelines for property owners to use to determine the health and safety of homes that may be meth contaminated. We applied those guidelines as the only guidelines available.

"We believe the recommended guidelines will enable us to get homes back into the letting pool faster, as well as save costs around testing and decontamination.”

« Tenancy Services takes on enforcer roleMeth threat still no.1 fear for landlords »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • The good guys get told off
    “I can't quite reconcile the rationale, or lack thereof, with the comments so far. Pathfinder were found to have made misleading...”
    2 days ago by John Milner
  • The good guys get told off
    “As a follow on to this conversation: I'm assuming that the Regulator will be consistent by 'naming and shaming' the other...”
    2 days ago by Pragmatic
  • The good guys get told off
    “FMA does not understand the consequences of these type of actions A number of Insurance Companies were taken to court and...”
    2 days ago by LNF
  • The good guys get told off
    “Superlife was censored for using unregistered salespeople however what is not commonly known was that the FMA were aware...”
    2 days ago by Patrickdiack
  • The good guys get told off
    “FMA executive director, Response and Enforcement, Louise Unger said:... Unger was appointed to that role in April of this...”
    3 days ago by Aggressively_passive
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News
Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
AIA - Back My Build 4.94 - - -
AIA - Go Home Loans 7.49 5.79 5.49 5.59
ANZ 7.39 6.39 6.19 6.19
ANZ Blueprint to Build 7.39 - - -
ANZ Good Energy - - - 1.00
ANZ Special - 5.79 5.59 5.59
ASB Bank 7.39 5.79 5.49 5.59
ASB Better Homes Top Up - - - 1.00
Avanti Finance 7.90 - - -
Basecorp Finance 8.35 - - -
BNZ - Classic - 5.99 5.69 5.69
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
BNZ - Mortgage One 7.54 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 7.54 - - -
BNZ - Std 7.44 5.79 5.59 5.69
BNZ - TotalMoney 7.54 - - -
CFML 321 Loans ▼5.80 - - -
CFML Home Loans ▼6.25 - - -
CFML Prime Loans ▼7.85 - - -
CFML Standard Loans ▼8.80 - - -
China Construction Bank - 7.09 6.75 6.49
China Construction Bank Special - - - -
Co-operative Bank - First Home Special - 5.69 - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 6.95 5.79 5.59 5.69
Co-operative Bank - Standard 6.95 6.29 6.09 6.19
Credit Union Auckland 7.70 - - -
First Credit Union Special - 5.99 5.89 -
First Credit Union Standard 7.69 6.69 6.39 -
Heartland Bank - Online 6.99 5.49 5.39 5.45
Heartland Bank - Reverse Mortgage - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society ▼8.15 ▼6.50 ▼6.30 -
ICBC 7.49 5.79 5.59 5.59
Kainga Ora 7.39 5.79 5.59 5.69
Kainga Ora - First Home Buyer Special - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Kiwibank 7.25 6.69 6.49 6.49
Kiwibank - Offset 7.25 - - -
Kiwibank Special 7.25 5.79 5.59 5.69
Liberty 8.59 8.69 8.79 8.94
Nelson Building Society 7.94 5.75 5.99 -
Pepper Money Advantage 10.49 - - -
Pepper Money Easy 8.69 - - -
Pepper Money Essential 8.29 - - -
SBS Bank 7.49 6.95 6.29 6.29
SBS Bank Special - 5.89 5.49 5.69
SBS Construction lending for FHB - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
SBS FirstHome Combo 4.94 4.89 - -
SBS FirstHome Combo - - - -
SBS Unwind reverse equity ▼9.39 - - -
TSB Bank 8.19 6.49 6.39 6.39
TSB Special 7.39 5.69 5.59 5.59
Unity 7.64 5.79 5.55 -
Unity First Home Buyer special - 5.49 - -
Wairarapa Building Society 7.70 5.95 5.75 -
Westpac 7.39 6.39 6.09 6.19
Westpac Choices Everyday 7.49 - - -
Westpac Offset 7.39 - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Westpac Special - 5.79 5.49 5.59
Median 7.49 5.79 5.69 5.69

Last updated: 18 December 2024 9:46am

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com