tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Saturday, December 28th, 10:36AM

Insurance

rss
Latest Headlines

Proposed changes should help industry, insurers say

New Zealand life insurers are unfazed by proposed changes coming for insurance contract law.

Thursday, December 5th 2019, 7:07PM

Commerce Minister Kris Faafoi this week announced plans that he said should give consumers more certainty when it came time to claim.

Among them was a requirement for insurers to ask the right questions to obtain necessary information from applicants – not put the duty of disclosure solely on clients – and to deal with customers who do not disclose something material "proportionately".

They will also have to present information in a way that customers can understand.

Naomi Ballantyne, managing director of Partners Life, said the proposals would not change a thing for her company as they currently stood. Some details are still to be worked through.

"We have always believed we need to ask the client the questions we need answered as clearly as possible to enable them to fully disclose and if we don’t ask we take responsibility. Our new automated application capture and underwriting engine (MUM) takes a huge leap forward in terms of ensuring questions are asked in the way consumers think about their health rather than the way insurers want to ask them. We agree wholeheartedly with this requirement," she said.

"We have also always had a 'fair and reasonable' provision in our policy wordings which protects the client against a 'punishment that outweighs the crime' when it comes to non-disclosure. We simply re-underwrite at application date based on the correct information and then provide cover on the basis of that 'corrected' underwriting. In other words the client is not better off or worse off than they ever should have been. We therefore also agree wholeheartedly with this requirement."

At Fidelity Life, Anna Black, chief risk officer, said the insurer supported the review because it wanted to see increased confidence and trust in insurers.

"In particular we’re pleased to see progress on the duty of disclosure, which in our view has become outdated. We look forward to seeing the draft legislation in due course and providing further feedback to ensure we finish with a good result.

"We’re pleased to see these and other proposed regulatory changes align with our goal for a successful and sustainable future with the customer at heart of everything we do.”

Katrina Shanks, chief executive of Financial Advice NZ, said the proposals should make the process of taking out insurance easier and simpler to understand for consumers.

“These proposed changes are not before time.

“A recent survey of our 1,680 adviser members showed that among the most common mistakes consumers make when it comes to insurance is not understanding their policy limitation. That generally comes down to how they are written.

“In fact, some 95% of advisers said the language and complexity of policies make it difficult for consumers to understand them, without specialist advice, while 97% said the language and complexity makes it difficult for consumers to compare policies."

She said the association thought the rules would take a lot of the uncertainty and confusion out of insurance policies.

“From what our advisers tell us, there is clearly a high level of misunderstanding and a lack of understanding when consumers look at insurance, and I’m confident these proposals will help deliver solutions that work and meet consumers’ needs.”

The Financial Services Council, which represents most of the country's life insurers, also supported the plans.

“The scope of the measures released is comprehensive and has a clear focus on improving outcomes for consumers," said chief executive Richard Klipin.

“They represent a modernisation of this technically complex area and will provide greater certainty, clarity and transparency for consumers.

“Managing risk through insurance is key for Kiwis and this package of changes will help make it easier, simpler and more accessible for all of us to ensure that we have the insurance cover we need."

He said the FSC's own code of conduct had already set its members out on this path.

"We now look forward to working through the proposed changes in detail and engaging constructively with the Government in the consultation process."

Tags: Fidelity Life Financial Advice New Zealand FSC Partners Life

« Govt reveals plans to change insurance rulesMBIE expects advisers to bear costs of regime change »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Partners exits Adviser Support Programme
Partners Life has moved its Adviser Support Programme to a third party compliance provider.

Apex Advice buys life business
Auckland-based Apex Advice has acquired a well-established insurance advice business.

Chubb's latest champion
Young maths prodigy takes out actuarial award.

New book: Unlocking group insurance
Christchurch adviser Corey Williams has released a new book helping advisers and employers put group insurance schemes in place.

News Bites
Latest Comments
  • The good guys get told off
    “Very prudent points as always @JohnMilner. Whilst I don’t disagree with the process, I question any advantages from the...”
    5 days ago by Pragmatic
  • [The Wrap] The year that was - and what may happen next year
    “Hope you have a good recovery Phil. Interesting points 1.Box ticking already happening with SOA 's that look identical...”
    6 days ago by Very Frustrated Adviser
  • [The Wrap] The year that was - and what may happen next year
    “Nice summary Phil. In short: . Consumers will expect more from the industry for less . Advisers will be increasingly time...”
    6 days ago by Pragmatic
  • The good guys get told off
    “I can't quite reconcile the rationale, or lack thereof, with the comments so far. Pathfinder were found to have made misleading...”
    9 days ago by John Milner
  • The good guys get told off
    “As a follow on to this conversation: I'm assuming that the Regulator will be consistent by 'naming and shaming' the other...”
    9 days ago by Pragmatic
Subscribe Now

Cover Notes - Specific news aimed at risk advisers

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com
x