Responsible talk not enough in 2021
What the Financial Markets Authority do if fund managers are caught greenwashing.
Tuesday, February 16th 2021, 6:00AM 
6 Comments
by Daniel Smith
The FMA have made it abundantly clear that any funds claiming to take into account non-financial factors such as natural, social and human capital impacts need to back themselves up with hard evidence.
FMA director of investment management, Paul Gregory, warned providers with greenwashed funds that they “need to check their rhetoric before your investors with Facebook and Reddit accounts do it for you.
“For example, if you’ve labelled your fund ‘responsible’, what does that mean to you? Especially when other providers have also used that label, and their portfolios are quite different.
“As another example, if you claim excluding alcohol is ‘ethical’ – what are the actual ethics, the values and principles, underpinning that exclusion. Are they reflected more broadly, like in your staff and investor functions? And if they aren’t – is it truly an ethical position?”
The FMA have clearly drawn a line in the sand by asking fund managers to consider more deeply the ethical thinking behind their funds, and whether or not they have the ability to prove it.
Gregory said that the FMA expects all providers making claims that they are offering an integrated financial product to be able to convincingly prove that they can:
- explain what they mean by terms such as “responsible”, “ethical” or “impact”
- substantiate the claims with evidence of how it is reflected in the investment process and the portfolio resulting from it
- give ongoing transparency to the investors about how their capital continues to be aligned to the values you as a provider claim to share with them.
This sentiment was confirmed by the regulator in FMA chief executive Rob Everett’s speech earlier in the event where he stated that, “As I’ve indicated before, we are fully behind the move to a sustainable finance system, and I applaud the great work of the Sustainable Finance Forum in that regard.”
Everett issued a harsh warning to any funds who believe they can continue to get away with greenwashing in 2021.
“I will say again, however, we will have little patience for issuers or product providers who try to rebadge their investment products as “green” or “responsible” without actually fundamentally reflecting that in the substance of the product and the rights of the investors.”
The FMA have made it clear to Good Returns that they will treat wilful deception in the space of green or impact funds, with the same degree of severity as they would any other area of regulation non-compliance.
In the guidance issued on green funds the FMA stated that “a formal feedback letter, or issuance of a public warning, stop order, direction order”, are all options for the regulator.
The section goes on to state that “If poor practices appear widespread we may publish a monitoring report to help educate the market.”
| « Three lessons for advisers from FADC case | Mann on a mission to diversify financial advice » |
Special Offers
Comments from our readers
And will said managers be required to file a weekly declaration that they or their staffs have not taken an aeroplane flight other than in a glider?
Insanity!
Sign In to add your comment
|
|
Printable version |
|
Email to a friend |
