KiwiSaver
Cullen's Super Policy Losing $83,000 a Week!
Monday 21st of January 2002
- Michael
Cullen is borrowing every dollar that he has so far set aside
for the fund. Such a super scheme in the private sector would
see Michael Cullen sent straight to jail yet another argument
in favour of privatisation.
- The accounts report: As at 30 November 2001 the amounts held by the New Zealand Debt Management Office totalled $256 million (including interest accrued at the official cash rate) (p.4).
- The accounts also report the Governments financing requirement over the five-month period to be $549 million (p.7).
- So Michael Cullen has set aside $256 million for future super, while borrowing an extra $549 million. Brilliant! His strategy is to increase the mortgage on the house to invest in the stock market. Precisely what every investment adviser in the country warns not to do, for obvious reasons.
- But whats worse is that Michael Cullens super fund is already losing money. He has yet to invest it. He has it stuffed in a bureaucratic sock earning just 4.75 percent (the Official Cash Rate). But hes had to borrow the $549 million at 6.44 percent (the ten year bond rate). The difference is 1.69 percent and this is what Michael Cullen is already losing taxpayers on his fund. The cost just this week of Michael Cullens super fund is $83,200.
- Only Michael Cullen would ever have the gall to borrow at 6.44 percent and invest at 4.75 and call that a pension fund. The rest of us would quite rightly call it a fraud, Rodney Hide concluded.
Want to read the full article?
Click the button below to subscribe and will have free unlimited access for a limited time to full article and all other articles on the site.
You will also be able to comment on articles on Good Returns.
Latest News
3 min read
Latest Comments
FMA wants clearer fees
The Report (p.14) contains the following recommendation for FAPs: "Disclose commissions as a dollar figure. While commissions can be disclosed as either a percentage or dollar figure, we consider disclosure in dollar terms to be good practice to assist with investors readily understanding what the adviser will get out of the advice process."
Disclosing commission in dollar figures was one of the 3 options floated in the April 2018 Disclosure Requirements discussion paper from MBIE.
This option was ultimately rejected in favour of a principles-based approach.
The examples of commission disclosure in the resulting Regulations ("Connor and Ari") are expressed in percentage terms.
While the FMA may hold the view that disclosure in dollar terms is "good practice", this is not where the regulations landed at the conclusion of the 2018 consultation process.
1 day ago Paul Flood
Advisers embrace Westpac after trail commissions removed
@The Laird - No, not really. The headline of this article could equally have been: "Advisers embrace Westpac after upfront commissions increased to highest across the main banks."
1 day ago Paul Flood
Advisers embrace Westpac after trail commissions removed
Doesn't this result call into question the criticism from certain quarters that Mortgage Advisers are driven predominantly by commission considerations?
1 day ago The Laird
FMA wants clearer fees
@first time caller - I can see the complexity you highlight, but as above, investors should be able to see what they are paying without having to reference multiple documents. Investment admin can track and report deductions for tax, withdrawals, fees et al, would be /should be straightforward to aggregate advice fees into costs at member level... at least I hope so.
2 days ago Goldcard
FMA wants clearer fees
@goldcard - how would you propose that a fund manager calculates the TER to include adviser fees given not all clients pay them and different advisers charge different fees, not to mention some advisors charge different fees to different clients? The advice fee gets disclosed in the adviser's disclosure statement and the statement of advice, so the client can add that to the published TER of the fund they are invested in to see how much they are paying overall.
3 days ago First time caller