tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Wednesday, December 25th, 8:49AM

Insurance

rss
Latest Headlines

Loathed quotation software

Quotation software has to be one of the most annoying things for an insurance adviser.

Thursday, September 9th 2010, 1:19PM 1 Comment

by Russell Hutchinson

Once upon a time there were rate books - and aren't we all glad those nasty little books filled with six point type and fiddly replaceable pages are gone!

But what we've got really isn't much better. Certainly, you are spared the maths, but now the challenge is to make sense of the software.

The problem is compounded because it becomes particularly acute for the most difficult and important of cases.

The simpler case that you "just know" fits with your preferred carrier is not the issue, you know your way around their software, even a fiendishly weird interface can be mastered with regular use.

The fuses all start to blow when you have a case of such size, difficulty, and importance that you want to pull together options from a number of different companies.

Merely quoting the premium is not enough - you must include real illustrations in your report.

This involves slogging through confusing menu structures, different conventions on what is saved, entered, exited, and varying language describing each benefit.

Even tiny variations - such as how most carriers describe income protection benefits as monthly but one in particular describes it as annual - can cause problems when you are quickly trying to swap between insurers comparatively.

God forbid that you should want to reduce commission on any of them - try finding that option in an unfamiliar quote package when you are in a hurry.

What is worse is when you realise that the actual calculation of the rate is very simple and takes very little space - tables and calculators are comfortably held in small handy spreadsheet files by actuaries.

What takes up all the space is the software to produce the pages of printed guff around the premium. Most of which you probably think is a waste of space.

« Spread it aroundAre independent financial advisers doomed? »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 21 September 2010 at 2:51 pm Bob said:
Clunky interfaces, benefits squashed together, messy installing process and horrible updating is a fact for the majority of quote softwares, I can only think of one company that has a visually easy look to it, the rest look very dated.

At the end of the day it's about getting the quote done, we don't want all the fancy stuff and complicated things!

Article seems to stop however... it could go on further.
Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Partners exits Adviser Support Programme
Partners Life has moved its Adviser Support Programme to a third party compliance provider.

Apex Advice buys life business
Auckland-based Apex Advice has acquired a well-established insurance advice business.

Chubb's latest champion
Young maths prodigy takes out actuarial award.

New book: Unlocking group insurance
Christchurch adviser Corey Williams has released a new book helping advisers and employers put group insurance schemes in place.

News Bites
Latest Comments
  • The good guys get told off
    “Very prudent points as always @JohnMilner. Whilst I don’t disagree with the process, I question any advantages from the...”
    3 days ago by Pragmatic
  • [The Wrap] The year that was - and what may happen next year
    “Hope you have a good recovery Phil. Interesting points 1.Box ticking already happening with SOA 's that look identical...”
    4 days ago by Very Frustrated Adviser
  • [The Wrap] The year that was - and what may happen next year
    “Nice summary Phil. In short: . Consumers will expect more from the industry for less . Advisers will be increasingly time...”
    4 days ago by Pragmatic
  • The good guys get told off
    “I can't quite reconcile the rationale, or lack thereof, with the comments so far. Pathfinder were found to have made misleading...”
    6 days ago by John Milner
  • The good guys get told off
    “As a follow on to this conversation: I'm assuming that the Regulator will be consistent by 'naming and shaming' the other...”
    7 days ago by Pragmatic
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com