tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Monday, December 30th, 8:18PM

News

rss
Latest Headlines

Concern adviser numbers will fall

There are concerns further regulatory change could drive more advisers from the industry.

Tuesday, January 19th 2016, 6:00AM 3 Comments

by Susan Edmunds

The Financial Markets Authority is consulting on its options paper for the Financial Advisers Act review and is holding workshops early next month with stakeholders.

One of the proposals that has caused the most early consternation relates to entity licensing - regulating advice businesses rather than the individual advisers themselves.

Wayne Smith, chief executive of the TripleA Advisers Association, said it could be hard on some and might force some practitioners out of the industry.

"About 70% of our members are sole operators with a further 23% in adviser firms of between two and 10 advisers. Around 60% are AFAs with two-thirds over 50 years of age. Entity licensing will create quite significant costs that will likely advantage large organisations such as banks etc over small adviser firms," he said.

"The result may well be a solid reduction of genuinely independent advisers in the market place over the coming years and that wouldn't be in the best interest of the consumer."

Smith said the demographic make-up of the industry was such that many advisers were nearing retirement.

Depending on what the regulatory review decided, some could be forced out, he said. "I'm not sure there's much of a pipeline of recruitment into the industry like there was, the industry is on watch anyway from a TripleA perspective. We'll have to watch and see what the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment does."

He said that, 10 years ago, many firms brought younger people in to the industry and provided training. "I'm not sure that's happening to the same extent."

He said there could be an opportunity for professional bodies and training organisations to provide training or financial advisers. It would help to have a clearer career path for people interested in the industry, he said.

Tags: financial advisers Financial Advisers Act MoBIE

« Risks indicators an education toolLVR restrictions to be reviewed »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 19 January 2016 at 12:43 pm The Oracle said:
Strange comments, I know Newpark recruited over 100 brand new advisers into the industry in 2015 and runs 8 new adviser training camps p.a.” I am also aware PartnersLife has been very busy all year with its new adviser training courses.Dealer groups are recruiting, training and developing advisers and I’m sure dealer groups will support advisers in the new regulatory world when it comes.
On 19 January 2016 at 2:44 pm gavin austin adviser business compliance said:
Wayne may have a good point. There has already been some reduction in AFA numbers and mostly it would be from the small one person or two person business sections. The FMA publishes an AFA list periodically and some simple analysis shows that from March 2015 to November 2015 AFA numbers fell from 2004 to 1853 – 151 less. What we don’t know is what made them stop practicing. Was it the FMC Act and it’s messy DIMS outcome? What we can see is that the number of QFE or Corporate employed AFAs has increased marginally and the number of individual AFAs in practice by themselves or in smaller groups has diminished by about 190. Will the results of the review of the FAA have a similar affect? Who knows? We do know that any additional impost of time and money won’t help with the retention of our aging AFA population. The challenge for the industry (ex QFEs and Corporate entities) is how to put in place a successful business succession plan that doesn’t involve simply selling the clients to the highest bidder. If this is your succession plan then what will happen is that the QFEs and Corporates with the big cheque books will win again. If you want to sell your business to someone like yourself who will care for your clients as you do then a different approach is going to be the challenge. Those businesses with a succession plan, sound simple compliant processes and a strong client Wayne may have a good point. There has already been some reduction in AFA numbers and mostly it would be from the small one person or two person business sections. The FMA publishes an AFA list periodically and some simple analysis shows that from March 2015 to November 2015 AFA numbers fell from 2004 to 1853 – 151 less. What we don’t know is what made them stop practicing. Was it the FMC Act and it’s messy DIMS outcome? What we can see is that the number of QFE or Corporate employed AFAs has increased marginally and the number of individual AFAs in practice by themselves or in smaller groups has diminished by about 190. Will the results of the review of the FAA have a similar affect? Who knows? We do know that any additional impost of time and money won’t help with the retention of our aging AFA population. The challenge for the industry (ex QFEs and Corporate entities) is how to put in place a successful business succession plan that doesn’t involve simply selling the clients to the highest bidder. If this is your succession plan then what will happen is that the QFEs and Corporates with the big cheque books will win again. If you want to sell your business to someone like yourself who will care for your clients as you do then a different approach is going to be the challenge. Those businesses with a succession plan, sound simple compliant processes and a strong client centric attitude combined with a simple “How we Add Value” statement will be the winners. 2016 already looks to be an interesting and challenging year for all stakeholders. attitude combined with a simple “How we Add Value” statement will be the winners. 2016 already looks to be an interesting and challenging year for all stakeholders.
On 20 January 2016 at 2:03 pm Pragmatic said:
Popping a cat amongst the pigeons with Gavin’s commentary:

1. What if large financial institutions (traditional buyers and recruiters) determine that wealth management is not for them? Perhaps it stuffs their balance sheets, taking funds from higher geared alternatives? Perhaps it’s easier simply to flog their own products
2. What if the consumer objects to having their relationship sold – at least without their consent?
3. What if the smaller practices (aka independent) are the only ones able to provide non-aligned solutions?
I suspect that at least one of these will occur, in the face of rising Regulatory pressures and consumer sophistication.

BTW: The majority of the remaining AFAs (1,853 according to Gavin) appear to be doing just right

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • The good guys get told off
    “Very prudent points as always @JohnMilner. Whilst I don’t disagree with the process, I question any advantages from the...”
    7 days ago by Pragmatic
  • [The Wrap] The year that was - and what may happen next year
    “Hope you have a good recovery Phil. Interesting points 1.Box ticking already happening with SOA 's that look identical...”
    8 days ago by Very Frustrated Adviser
  • [The Wrap] The year that was - and what may happen next year
    “Nice summary Phil. In short: . Consumers will expect more from the industry for less . Advisers will be increasingly time...”
    8 days ago by Pragmatic
  • The good guys get told off
    “I can't quite reconcile the rationale, or lack thereof, with the comments so far. Pathfinder were found to have made misleading...”
    11 days ago by John Milner
  • The good guys get told off
    “As a follow on to this conversation: I'm assuming that the Regulator will be consistent by 'naming and shaming' the other...”
    11 days ago by Pragmatic
Subscribe Now

Weekly Wrap

Previous News
Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
AIA - Back My Build 4.94 - - -
AIA - Go Home Loans 7.49 5.79 5.49 5.59
ANZ 7.39 6.39 6.19 6.19
ANZ Blueprint to Build 7.39 - - -
ANZ Good Energy - - - 1.00
ANZ Special - 5.79 5.59 5.59
ASB Bank 7.39 5.79 5.49 5.59
ASB Better Homes Top Up - - - 1.00
Avanti Finance 7.90 - - -
Basecorp Finance 8.35 - - -
BNZ - Classic - 5.99 5.69 5.69
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
BNZ - Mortgage One 7.54 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 7.54 - - -
BNZ - Std 7.44 5.79 5.59 5.69
BNZ - TotalMoney 7.54 - - -
CFML 321 Loans 5.80 - - -
CFML Home Loans 6.25 - - -
CFML Prime Loans 7.85 - - -
CFML Standard Loans 8.80 - - -
China Construction Bank - 7.09 6.75 6.49
China Construction Bank Special - - - -
Co-operative Bank - First Home Special - 5.69 - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 6.95 5.79 5.59 5.69
Co-operative Bank - Standard 6.95 6.29 6.09 6.19
Credit Union Auckland 7.70 - - -
First Credit Union Special - 5.99 5.89 -
First Credit Union Standard 7.69 6.69 6.39 -
Heartland Bank - Online 6.99 5.49 5.39 5.45
Heartland Bank - Reverse Mortgage - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 8.15 6.50 6.30 -
ICBC 7.49 5.79 5.59 5.59
Kainga Ora 7.39 5.79 5.59 5.69
Kainga Ora - First Home Buyer Special - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Kiwibank 7.25 6.69 6.49 6.49
Kiwibank - Offset 7.25 - - -
Kiwibank Special 7.25 5.79 5.59 5.69
Liberty 8.59 8.69 8.79 8.94
Nelson Building Society 7.94 5.75 5.99 -
Pepper Money Advantage 10.49 - - -
Pepper Money Easy 8.69 - - -
Pepper Money Essential 8.29 - - -
SBS Bank 7.49 6.95 6.29 6.29
SBS Bank Special - 5.89 5.49 5.69
SBS Construction lending for FHB - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
SBS FirstHome Combo 4.94 4.89 - -
SBS FirstHome Combo - - - -
SBS Unwind reverse equity 9.39 - - -
TSB Bank 8.19 6.49 6.39 6.39
TSB Special 7.39 5.69 5.59 5.59
Unity 7.64 5.79 5.55 -
Unity First Home Buyer special - 5.49 - -
Wairarapa Building Society 7.70 5.95 5.75 -
Westpac 7.39 6.39 6.09 6.19
Westpac Choices Everyday 7.49 - - -
Westpac Offset 7.39 - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Westpac Special - 5.79 5.49 5.59
Median 7.49 5.79 5.69 5.69

Last updated: 23 December 2024 5:49pm

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com