tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Wednesday, February 5th, 7:01PM

Insurance

rss
Latest Headlines

Setting trauma sums insured

Of course some advisers don’t like trauma insurance at all, but if you do include it in packages, then having a sound approach to setting the sum insured is worth thinking about.

Wednesday, January 25th 2017, 11:00AM

by Russell Hutchinson

Clients will ask, of course, and sooner or later the regulator may ask too.

The first big factor is whether you already have income protection in the recommended package. If you so, then trauma cover can be lower, because there may be significant overlap in cover with income protection. If income protection is not in the package (for whatever reason, cost or occupation class), then probably the sums for trauma (and perhaps TPD) should be more substantial.

For ‘domestic’ business, there are three main identifiable approaches based on quote data, in reverse order of usage:

  • Buy the same trauma as the life cover amount – which is typically something like the value of a home loan, and results in the largest sums insured.
  • Buy $100,000 trauma.
  • Buy $50,000 trauma.

Of course, in a budget constrained world these are ‘rules of thumb’ which result in ‘buyable’ numbers are quite useful. But they aren’t very needs based. The problem with needs-based approaches is that some are very abstract, and can result in telephone numbers, that no-one buys.

As a fairly old-fashioned person I like to recall the principle of indemnity. Quantifying typical losses can give us an approach that is both needs-based, and results in sensible numbers. Taking such an approach underlines the role of income protection insurance too. If living without an income for a long period is your worry, then you really need to buy income insurance. That leaves trauma with an easier job: creating options, such as quitting your job early, spending time with family, or paying for unfunded treatments.

Talking about what those things might cost with your client is then the easy path to talking about what the sum insured is. If you want to quit your job early the conversation can settle on whether you would like half a year’s salary, or a year. You can work out the cost of living legacies.

For a more data-informed version of this, you can access company information about the duration and cost of treatments from diagnosis to recovery for the most common trauma conditions: cancer and heart disease. More detail on that, in another column.

Tags: Russell Hutchinson

« Things we wish we could insure against over the holidaysIs that really advice? »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Gut on you Asteron
Asteron Life joins forces with the Gut Foundation as platinum sponsor.

Partners exits Adviser Support Programme
Partners Life has moved its Adviser Support Programme to a third party compliance provider.

Apex Advice buys life business
Auckland-based Apex Advice has acquired a well-established insurance advice business.

Chubb's latest champion
Young maths prodigy takes out actuarial award.

News Bites
Latest Comments
  • [OPINION] Is the risk industry at risk?
    “If you haven't figured out why insurers have by and large decided that the cost of adviser support and service is less important...”
    8 hours ago by mentats
  • [OPINION] Is the risk industry at risk?
    “Well said John, an unsurprising read and one that the comments reflect isn’t an unusual experience. The idea that advisers...”
    16 hours ago by JPHale
  • [OPINION] Is the risk industry at risk?
    “Some interesting insights into the insurance industry - which (as a non insurance sort) I assumed was an extremely competitive...”
    4 days ago by Pragmatic
  • [OPINION] Is the risk industry at risk?
    “David, I could not agree more and this should be the number 1 issue for any adviser body this year. Current insurer inefficiencies...”
    6 days ago by Backstage
  • [OPINION] Is the risk industry at risk?
    “This issue of poor provider service is more serious than we yet realise. When CoFI hits - shortly - FAPs and FAs will be...”
    6 days ago by dcwhyte
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com