tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Wednesday, December 25th, 8:49AM

Insurance

rss
Latest Headlines

'Mediators always side with clients'

A case in which an insurance broker was criticised for not conducting a full review of a client’s policy at renewal is being held up as a warning to other advisers.

Thursday, November 8th 2018, 6:00AM 2 Comments

The issue arose when Newpark General took over the fire and general clients of another adviser.

A year before that transfer, the previous adviser had reviewed the clients’ cover and downgraded it to a policy that excluded their swimming pool.

Newpark General then renewed the policy on the same terms, with a notice to the client including a summary of their cover and policy wordings, and a schedule reflecting benefits, insured risks and values.

This was sent with the policy wording and an invoice and note asking the client to advise Newpark if they wanted to change anything.

The client then suffered earthquake damage and claimed for a swimming pool repair.

The insurer declined the claim.

“I think they either simply forgot it wasn’t insured, or the original adviser never told them the cover was removed,” said adviser Herman Roodt.

“They then took us to the DRS FSCL for mediation which was also attended by the original adviser and his PI insurer’s representative. This adviser’s PI insurer immediately attacked me saying we should have done a full review of covers, which I rejected as no advice was given, and with domestic F&G the norm is not to review domestic cover personally with clients. It is just not viable to do personal reviews with all domestic clients. These renewals are all done via electronic/paper correspondence."

He said, after he left the meeting, the original adviser accepted his mistake and offered to pay 50 per cent of the $34,000 claim.

The client has now gone to the Disputes Tribunal and Roodt said he would be attending a telephone conciliation meeting next month for the remaining $15,000.

He said advisers often felt that mediators acted with bias towards a client – and a similar thing could happen to those dealing in life policies.

“The mediator always believes the bid bag wolf insurance adviser (or it’s company) has deep pockets and unlimited PI insurance and the poor client who never did anything wrong should be compensated irrespective of whether it’s right or not."

Tags: complaints

« Health funds stats 'hark back 20 years'Insurers grapple with increasing genetic testing »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 8 November 2018 at 9:37 am Mr Slater said:
Herman I don't know the specifics of your case but I do have to strongly disagree with your comments that mediators side with clients.

I have been a mediator for over 20 years and I can say this is not my practice or the practice of the mediators that I know.

Mediation should be about exploring the issues and looking for options to resolve the dispute that both parties can live with, not pushing the person with money to pay compensation.

If that's what you experienced then it sounds to me you didn't have a good mediation. I hope your next experience is better.
On 9 November 2018 at 10:11 am Referee said:
I fully agree with Trevor's comments from first hand experience. Early action with facilitation and/or mediation is certainly the best form of resolution.

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Partners exits Adviser Support Programme
Partners Life has moved its Adviser Support Programme to a third party compliance provider.

Apex Advice buys life business
Auckland-based Apex Advice has acquired a well-established insurance advice business.

Chubb's latest champion
Young maths prodigy takes out actuarial award.

New book: Unlocking group insurance
Christchurch adviser Corey Williams has released a new book helping advisers and employers put group insurance schemes in place.

News Bites
Latest Comments
  • The good guys get told off
    “Very prudent points as always @JohnMilner. Whilst I don’t disagree with the process, I question any advantages from the...”
    3 days ago by Pragmatic
  • [The Wrap] The year that was - and what may happen next year
    “Hope you have a good recovery Phil. Interesting points 1.Box ticking already happening with SOA 's that look identical...”
    4 days ago by Very Frustrated Adviser
  • [The Wrap] The year that was - and what may happen next year
    “Nice summary Phil. In short: . Consumers will expect more from the industry for less . Advisers will be increasingly time...”
    4 days ago by Pragmatic
  • The good guys get told off
    “I can't quite reconcile the rationale, or lack thereof, with the comments so far. Pathfinder were found to have made misleading...”
    6 days ago by John Milner
  • The good guys get told off
    “As a follow on to this conversation: I'm assuming that the Regulator will be consistent by 'naming and shaming' the other...”
    7 days ago by Pragmatic
Subscribe Now

Cover Notes - Specific news aimed at risk advisers

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com
x