tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Tuesday, February 4th, 6:00AM

Insurance

rss
Latest Headlines

Opinion: Can you shortlist? Can you choose?

After ‘how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?', one of the stranger questions I hear is ‘will we be allowed to not recommend a product when regulation comes in?'

Thursday, September 17th 2009, 3:26PM 1 Comment

by Russell Hutchinson

It would take a lot of space to dredge through all the assumptions behind such an idea, but the central one is that somehow you cannot have a limited product universe.

I cannot read the minds of the Securities Commission any more than you, but you may be interested to know that a little while ago Britain's Financial Services Authority examined the issue after a complaint from a client that their mortgage broker did not recommend a cheaper ‘direct' special offer (that would have paid no commission), but instead chose to recommend a product from the company's list.

The FSA came back and, much to everyone's relief, decided that the company did not have to scour the earth searching for the cheapest deal, not bearing any commission at all - a sort of financial Mother Theresa.

Now that is a comforting thought, isn't it. Provided our own regulators come to a similar conclusion.

But there remains work to be done. Companies can be helpful here too - differentiating between direct and adviser offers, and restricting access to certain products according to the channels (types of advisers) that may wish to access them.

This will make the management of recommended product lists at adviser businesses easier. There is a consumer benefit too: it will also ensure that quality financial advice is always available to consumers - because if you mandate a price of zero - supply will pretty soon dry up.

 

 

« Opinion: The power of freeOpinion: Quick need not be dirty »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 18 September 2009 at 11:14 am Andrew said:
It would be an interesting precedent if the product "not being offered" was on the advisers APL or he held an agency with that provider.
Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Gut on you Asteron
Asteron Life joins forces with the Gut Foundation as platinum sponsor.

Partners exits Adviser Support Programme
Partners Life has moved its Adviser Support Programme to a third party compliance provider.

Apex Advice buys life business
Auckland-based Apex Advice has acquired a well-established insurance advice business.

Chubb's latest champion
Young maths prodigy takes out actuarial award.

News Bites
Latest Comments
  • [OPINION] Is the risk industry at risk?
    “Some interesting insights into the insurance industry - which (as a non insurance sort) I assumed was an extremely competitive...”
    3 days ago by Pragmatic
  • [OPINION] Is the risk industry at risk?
    “David, I could not agree more and this should be the number 1 issue for any adviser body this year. Current insurer inefficiencies...”
    4 days ago by Backstage
  • [OPINION] Is the risk industry at risk?
    “This issue of poor provider service is more serious than we yet realise. When CoFI hits - shortly - FAPs and FAs will be...”
    4 days ago by dcwhyte
  • [OPINION] Is the risk industry at risk?
    “Great feedback from Aggressively_passive and backstage. I'm sure we could write a book regarding poor service and outcomes...”
    5 days ago by John Milner
  • [OPINION] Is the risk industry at risk?
    “John, you are so right. You would have imagined with the technology we have now and the advancements, the service would be...”
    6 days ago by Backstage
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com